Will Haiti advance from the group stage at World Cup 2026?

OddsFlow AI gives Haiti a 34.0% probability of advancing from the group stage at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. This is based on Dixon-Coles modeling with Monte Carlo simulations across all group-stage scenarios.

Can Haiti win the 2026 World Cup?

Haiti has a 0.0% probability of winning the 2026 FIFA World Cup according to OddsFlow AI analysis. The team has an overall rating of 50/100 (Attack: 47, Midfield: 43, Defense: 42, Goalkeeping: 79).

What is Haiti's overall rating for World Cup 2026?

Haiti has an AI-generated overall rating of 50/100 for the 2026 World Cup. Breakdown: Attack 47, Midfield 43, Defense 42, Goalkeeping 79. Playing style: Balanced.

Who are Haiti's star players at World Cup 2026?

Haiti's top players for the 2026 World Cup include: L. Joseph (Attacker, OPR 65, 11G 4A (1825min)); A. Pierre (Goalkeeper, OPR 64, OPR 64); J. Bellegarde (Midfielder, OPR 64, 1G 2A (1899min)); H. Delcroix (Defender, OPR 61, 1G 0A (1385min)); J. Placide (Goalkeeper, OPR 60, OPR 60).

What is Haiti's full tournament path prediction for World Cup 2026?

Haiti's tournament path probabilities: Group stage 40.4%, Round of 32 40.4%, Round of 16 14.1%, Quarter-finals 5.0%, Semi-finals 1.9%, Final 0.8%, Champion 0.2%. Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.

How strong is Haiti's squad for World Cup 2026?

Haiti's Dixon-Coles strength metrics: Attack power 46.2, Midfield control 42.0, Defensive solidity 41.3, GK rating 79.4. Lambda attack 1.02, lambda defense 1.08. Chemistry score 20, squad depth 78. Top scorer: W. Isidor (6 goals).

Haiti — World Cup 2026 AI Analysis (Rating 50/100)

OddsFlow AI Analysis

50Overall

Balanced

⚡Attack

⚙️Midfield

🛡️Defense

🧤Goalkeeping

26Squad Size

27.0Avg Age

52.5Avg OVR

78.0Depth Score

50Overall

Balanced

⚡Attack

⚙️Midfield

🛡️Defense

🧤Goalkeeping

26Squad Size

27.0Avg Age

52.5Avg OVR

78.0Depth Score

Star Players

L. Joseph

Attacker

11G 4A (1825min)

A. Pierre

Goalkeeper

OPR 64

J. Bellegarde

Midfielder

1G 2A (1899min)

H. Delcroix

Defender

1G 0A (1385min)

J. Placide

Goalkeeper

OPR 60

Tournament Probability

34.0%Advance from GroupAdvance from Group

34.0%

Strengths

Top-class goalkeeper

Weaknesses

Weak midfield control

Low team cohesion

Manager & Tactical Profile

· Appointed

Tournament Path Forecast

40.4%

Group

40.4%

R32

14.1%

R16

5.0%

1.9%

0.8%

Final

0.2%

Champion

Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.02

λ Attack

1.08

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

5.6

Star Gap

Avg Age

Top Scorer

W. Isidor

6 goals

Best Rated

A. Pierre

7.30

Club Clusters

Vizela (2)Haiti (2)

WC Experience

Appearances1

Best FinishGroup Stage

Last WC1974

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season1,175

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiLOW — humidity-adapted squad

MonterreyLOW — heat-adapted

Hot Climate %77%

Cooperation

Score38/100

Total Clubs23

Same-Club Pairs2

Same-League87

Average — typical international squad

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

46%

26%

27%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Qatar

1-1▼

45%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 44%BTTS 48%

Iran

0-1▼

44%

28%

xG 1.3 – 1.0O2.5 41%BTTS 46%

Tunisia

1-0▼

44%

27%

29%

xG 1.3 – 1.0O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Ghana

1-1▼

43%

27%

30%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 48%

Jordan

1-1▼

43%

28%

29%

xG 1.3 – 1.0O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

42%

27%

31%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 48%

Panama

1-1▼

41%

29%

30%

xG 1.2 – 1.0O2.5 38%BTTS 45%

Iraq

1-1▼

41%

29%

31%

xG 1.2 – 1.0O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Ecuador

1-1▼

40%

29%

31%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Canada

1-1▼

40%

27%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Norway

1-1▼

40%

27%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

39%

27%

33%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 48%

Scotland

1-1▼

39%

27%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Egypt

1-1▼

39%

28%

33%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Colombia

1-1▼

39%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Uzbekistan

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

New Zealand

1-1▼

38%

27%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Morocco

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 47%

Australia

1-1▼

38%

29%

33%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 48%

Paraguay

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

USA

1-1▼

37%

29%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Switzerland

1-1▼

37%

27%

36%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Sweden

1-1▼

37%

29%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

Congo DR

1-1▼

37%

29%

35%

xG 1.1 – 1.1O2.5 38%BTTS 45%

Curaçao

1-1▼

36%

30%

34%

xG 1.1 – 1.1O2.5 36%BTTS 43%

Croatia

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

South Korea

1-1▼

36%

29%

35%

xG 1.1 – 1.1O2.5 37%BTTS 44%

Japan

1-1▼

36%

28%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

South Africa

1-1▼

35%

28%

36%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Belgium

1-1▼

35%

27%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Uruguay

1-1▼

35%

28%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Netherlands

1-1▼

35%

26%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

34%

28%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Mexico

1-1▼

34%

28%

37%

xG 1.1 – 1.2O2.5 41%BTTS 48%

Senegal

1-1▼

34%

28%

38%

xG 1.1 – 1.2O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Argentina

1-1▼

34%

28%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Brazil

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Algeria

1-1▼

34%

28%

38%

xG 1.1 – 1.2O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Spain

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Austria

1-1▼

33%

28%

38%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Saudi Arabia

1-1▼

33%

28%

39%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Germany

1-1▼

33%

27%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Türkiye

1-1▼

31%

27%

42%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

England

1-1▼

30%

26%

44%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

France

1-1▼

30%

26%

44%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Portugal

1-1▼

29%

28%

43%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.02

λ Attack

1.08

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

5.6

Star Gap

Avg Age

Top Scorer

W. Isidor

6 goals

Best Rated

A. Pierre

7.30

Club Clusters

Vizela (2)Haiti (2)

WC Experience

Appearances1

Best FinishGroup Stage

Last WC1974

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season1,175

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiLOW — humidity-adapted squad

MonterreyLOW — heat-adapted

Hot Climate %77%

Cooperation

Score38/100

Total Clubs23

Same-Club Pairs2

Same-League87

Average — typical international squad

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

46%

26%

27%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Qatar

1-1▼

45%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 44%BTTS 48%

Iran

0-1▼

44%

28%

xG 1.3 – 1.0O2.5 41%BTTS 46%

Tunisia

1-0▼

44%

27%

29%

xG 1.3 – 1.0O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Ghana

1-1▼

43%

27%

30%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 48%

Jordan

1-1▼

43%

28%

29%

xG 1.3 – 1.0O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

42%

27%

31%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 48%

Panama

1-1▼

41%

29%

30%

xG 1.2 – 1.0O2.5 38%BTTS 45%

Iraq

1-1▼

41%

29%

31%

xG 1.2 – 1.0O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Ecuador

1-1▼

40%

29%

31%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Canada

1-1▼

40%

27%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Norway

1-1▼

40%

27%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

39%

27%

33%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 48%

Scotland

1-1▼

39%

27%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Egypt

1-1▼

39%

28%

33%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Colombia

1-1▼

39%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Uzbekistan

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

New Zealand

1-1▼

38%

27%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Morocco

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 47%

Australia

1-1▼

38%

29%

33%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 48%

Paraguay

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

USA

1-1▼

37%

29%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Switzerland

1-1▼

37%

27%

36%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Sweden

1-1▼

37%

29%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

Congo DR

1-1▼

37%

29%

35%

xG 1.1 – 1.1O2.5 38%BTTS 45%

Curaçao

1-1▼

36%

30%

34%

xG 1.1 – 1.1O2.5 36%BTTS 43%

Croatia

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

South Korea

1-1▼

36%

29%

35%

xG 1.1 – 1.1O2.5 37%BTTS 44%

Japan

1-1▼

36%

28%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

South Africa

1-1▼

35%

28%

36%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Belgium

1-1▼

35%

27%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Uruguay

1-1▼

35%

28%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Netherlands

1-1▼

35%

26%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

34%

28%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Mexico

1-1▼

34%

28%

37%

xG 1.1 – 1.2O2.5 41%BTTS 48%

Senegal

1-1▼

34%

28%

38%

xG 1.1 – 1.2O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Argentina

1-1▼

34%

28%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Brazil

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Algeria

1-1▼

34%

28%

38%

xG 1.1 – 1.2O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Spain

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Austria

1-1▼

33%

28%

38%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Saudi Arabia

1-1▼

33%

28%

39%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Germany

1-1▼

33%

27%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Türkiye

1-1▼

31%

27%

42%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

England

1-1▼

30%

26%

44%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

France

1-1▼

30%

26%

44%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Portugal

1-1▼

29%

28%

43%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Haiti

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Star Players

Tournament Probability

Strengths

Weaknesses

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

Get 1 FREE Live AI Signal — No Delay

Haiti

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Star Players

Tournament Probability

Strengths

Weaknesses

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

Get 1 FREE Live AI Signal — No Delay