Will Czechia advance from the group stage at World Cup 2026?

OddsFlow AI gives Czechia a 75.9% probability of advancing from the group stage at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. This is based on Dixon-Coles modeling with Monte Carlo simulations across all group-stage scenarios.

Can Czechia win the 2026 World Cup?

Czechia has a 1.1% probability of winning the 2026 FIFA World Cup according to OddsFlow AI analysis. The team has an overall rating of 50/100 (Attack: 50, Midfield: 50, Defense: 47, Goalkeeping: 54).

What is Czechia's overall rating for World Cup 2026?

Czechia has an AI-generated overall rating of 50/100 for the 2026 World Cup. Breakdown: Attack 50, Midfield 50, Defense 47, Goalkeeping 54. Playing style: Well-drilled unit.

Who are Czechia's star players at World Cup 2026?

Czechia's top players for the 2026 World Cup include: M. Kovář (Goalkeeper, OPR 72, OPR 72); L. Horníček (Goalkeeper, OPR 70, OPR 70); L. Krejčí (Defender, OPR 66, 2G 1A (2946min)); T. Holeš (Defender, OPR 66, 2G 3A (2551min)); Š. Chaloupek (Defender, OPR 66, 10G 2A (2395min)).

What is Czechia's full tournament path prediction for World Cup 2026?

Czechia's tournament path probabilities: Group stage 84.3%, Round of 32 84.3%, Round of 16 44.5%, Quarter-finals 24.0%, Semi-finals 12.2%, Final 6.2%, Champion 2.9%. Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.

How strong is Czechia's squad for World Cup 2026?

Czechia's Dixon-Coles strength metrics: Attack power 49.4, Midfield control 49.7, Defensive solidity 46.8, GK rating 52.4. Lambda attack 1.37, lambda defense 1.31. Chemistry score 92, squad depth 89. Top scorer: P. Schick (20 goals).

Czechia — World Cup 2026 AI Analysis (Rating 50/100)

OddsFlow AI Analysis

50Overall

Well-drilled unit

⚡Attack

⚙️Midfield

🛡️Defense

🧤Goalkeeping

26Squad Size

26.6Avg Age

60.9Avg OVR

89.0Depth Score

50Overall

Well-drilled unit

⚡Attack

⚙️Midfield

🛡️Defense

🧤Goalkeeping

26Squad Size

26.6Avg Age

60.9Avg OVR

89.0Depth Score

Star Players

M. Kovář

Goalkeeper

OPR 72

L. Horníček

Goalkeeper

OPR 70

L. Krejčí

Defender

2G 1A (2946min)

T. Holeš

Defender

2G 3A (2551min)

Š. Chaloupek

Defender

10G 2A (2395min)

Tournament Probability

1.1%ChampionChampion

1.1%

75.9%Advance from GroupAdvance from Group

75.9%

Strengths

Prolific attack

Strong team chemistry

Deep squad rotation

Weaknesses

Uncertain goalkeeper

Manager & Tactical Profile

· Appointed

Tournament Path Forecast

84.3%

Group

84.3%

R32

44.5%

R16

24.0%

12.2%

6.2%

Final

2.9%

Champion

Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.37

λ Attack

1.31

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

7.6

Star Gap

26.6

Avg Age

Top Scorer

P. Schick

20 goals

Best Rated

V. Darida

7.44

Club Clusters

Slavia Praha (10)Sparta Praha (3)1899 Hoffenheim (3)Plzen (3)

WC Experience

Appearances2

Best FinishRunner-up 1962

Last WC2006

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season2,515

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiMODERATE

MonterreyMODERATE

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score82/100

Total Clubs11

Same-Club Pairs54

Same-League112

Excellent — strong club connections

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

Iraq

0-1▼

52%

25%

23%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 47%

Curaçao

0-1▼

52%

26%

22%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 46%

South Africa

0-1▼

52%

25%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 46%

Iran

0-1▼

51%

26%

22%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 48%

South Korea

0-1▼

51%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

Haiti

1-0▼

51%

27%

22%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 43%BTTS 47%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

51%

24%

25%

xG 1.6 – 1.1O2.5 52%BTTS 53%

Uzbekistan

0-1▼

51%

27%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 43%BTTS 46%

Qatar

1-1▼

48%

25%

27%

xG 1.6 – 1.1O2.5 49%BTTS 52%

Egypt

1-1▼

47%

25%

28%

xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 54%BTTS 56%

Jordan

1-1▼

46%

26%

28%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Tunisia

1-1▼

46%

26%

28%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Ghana

1-1▼

46%

26%

28%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Panama

1-1▼

45%

26%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 45%BTTS 49%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

45%

25%

30%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 53%

Scotland

1-1▼

43%

25%

31%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

Norway

1-1▼

43%

25%

32%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Ecuador

1-1▼

43%

26%

31%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

Canada

1-1▼

43%

25%

32%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 53%BTTS 56%

Australia

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

42%

25%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

New Zealand

1-1▼

42%

25%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Morocco

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 52%

Paraguay

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Saudi Arabia

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Colombia

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Mexico

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

USA

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Sweden

1-1▼

40%

26%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Switzerland

1-1▼

40%

27%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Algeria

1-1▼

40%

25%

35%

xG 1.5 – 1.4O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

Congo DR

1-1▼

39%

25%

36%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Belgium

1-1▼

39%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Croatia

1-1▼

38%

25%

37%

xG 1.4 – 1.4O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Japan

1-1▼

38%

27%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Netherlands

1-1▼

37%

25%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 53%

Brazil

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Uruguay

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Senegal

1-1▼

36%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Argentina

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

Austria

1-1▼

36%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Spain

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Germany

1-1▼

36%

25%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 54%

Türkiye

1-1▼

35%

26%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

England

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

Portugal

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

France

1-1▼

31%

25%

44%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.37

λ Attack

1.31

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

7.6

Star Gap

26.6

Avg Age

Top Scorer

P. Schick

20 goals

Best Rated

V. Darida

7.44

Club Clusters

Slavia Praha (10)Sparta Praha (3)1899 Hoffenheim (3)Plzen (3)

WC Experience

Appearances2

Best FinishRunner-up 1962

Last WC2006

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season2,515

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiMODERATE

MonterreyMODERATE

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score82/100

Total Clubs11

Same-Club Pairs54

Same-League112

Excellent — strong club connections

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

Iraq

0-1▼

52%

25%

23%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 47%

Curaçao

0-1▼

52%

26%

22%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 46%

South Africa

0-1▼

52%

25%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 46%

Iran

0-1▼

51%

26%

22%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 48%

South Korea

0-1▼

51%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

Haiti

1-0▼

51%

27%

22%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 43%BTTS 47%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

51%

24%

25%

xG 1.6 – 1.1O2.5 52%BTTS 53%

Uzbekistan

0-1▼

51%

27%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 43%BTTS 46%

Qatar

1-1▼

48%

25%

27%

xG 1.6 – 1.1O2.5 49%BTTS 52%

Egypt

1-1▼

47%

25%

28%

xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 54%BTTS 56%

Jordan

1-1▼

46%

26%

28%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Tunisia

1-1▼

46%

26%

28%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Ghana

1-1▼

46%

26%

28%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Panama

1-1▼

45%

26%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 45%BTTS 49%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

45%

25%

30%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 53%

Scotland

1-1▼

43%

25%

31%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

Norway

1-1▼

43%

25%

32%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Ecuador

1-1▼

43%

26%

31%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

Canada

1-1▼

43%

25%

32%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 53%BTTS 56%

Australia

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

42%

25%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

New Zealand

1-1▼

42%

25%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Morocco

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 52%

Paraguay

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Saudi Arabia

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Colombia

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Mexico

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

USA

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Sweden

1-1▼

40%

26%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Switzerland

1-1▼

40%

27%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Algeria

1-1▼

40%

25%

35%

xG 1.5 – 1.4O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

Congo DR

1-1▼

39%

25%

36%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Belgium

1-1▼

39%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Croatia

1-1▼

38%

25%

37%

xG 1.4 – 1.4O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Japan

1-1▼

38%

27%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Netherlands

1-1▼

37%

25%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 53%

Brazil

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Uruguay

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Senegal

1-1▼

36%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Argentina

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

Austria

1-1▼

36%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Spain

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Germany

1-1▼

36%

25%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 54%

Türkiye

1-1▼

35%

26%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

England

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

Portugal

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

France

1-1▼

31%

25%

44%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

Czechia

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Star Players

Tournament Probability

Strengths

Weaknesses

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

Get 1 FREE Live AI Signal — No Delay

Czechia

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Star Players

Tournament Probability

Strengths

Weaknesses

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

Get 1 FREE Live AI Signal — No Delay