Will Curaçao advance from the group stage at World Cup 2026?

OddsFlow AI gives Curaçao a 39.7% probability of advancing from the group stage at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. This is based on Dixon-Coles modeling with Monte Carlo simulations across all group-stage scenarios.

Can Curaçao win the 2026 World Cup?

Curaçao has a 0.1% probability of winning the 2026 FIFA World Cup according to OddsFlow AI analysis. The team has an overall rating of 50/100 (Attack: 46, Midfield: 49, Defense: 46, Goalkeeping: 66).

What is Curaçao's overall rating for World Cup 2026?

Curaçao has an AI-generated overall rating of 50/100 for the 2026 World Cup. Breakdown: Attack 46, Midfield 49, Defense 46, Goalkeeping 66. Playing style: Balanced.

Who are Curaçao's star players at World Cup 2026?

Curaçao's top players for the 2026 World Cup include: A. Obispo (Defender, OPR 66, 2G 1A (1862min)); E. Room (Goalkeeper, OPR 66, OPR 66); R. van Eijma (Defender, OPR 65, 1G 0A (790min)); Deveron Fonville (Defender, OPR 65, OPR 65); S. Sambo (Defender, OPR 64, OPR 64).

What are Curaçao's strengths and weaknesses?

Strengths: Top-class goalkeeper. Squad depth score: 80.0, average age: 27.1.

What is Curaçao's full tournament path prediction for World Cup 2026?

Curaçao's tournament path probabilities: Group stage 45.6%, Round of 32 45.6%, Round of 16 16.2%, Quarter-finals 5.7%, Semi-finals 1.8%, Final 0.5%, Champion 0.1%. Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.

How strong is Curaçao's squad for World Cup 2026?

Curaçao's Dixon-Coles strength metrics: Attack power 44.5, Midfield control 48.4, Defensive solidity 46.4, GK rating 78.9. Lambda attack 1.16, lambda defense 0.94. Chemistry score 58, squad depth 80. Top scorer: B. Kuwas (5 goals).

Curaçao — World Cup 2026 AI Analysis (Rating 50/100)

OddsFlow AI Analysis

50Overall

Balanced

⚡Attack

⚙️Midfield

🛡️Defense

🧤Goalkeeping

26Squad Size

27.1Avg Age

55.0Avg OVR

80.0Depth Score

50Overall

Balanced

⚡Attack

⚙️Midfield

🛡️Defense

🧤Goalkeeping

26Squad Size

27.1Avg Age

55.0Avg OVR

80.0Depth Score

Star Players

A. Obispo

Defender

2G 1A (1862min)

E. Room

Goalkeeper

OPR 66

R. van Eijma

Defender

1G 0A (790min)

Deveron Fonville

Defender

OPR 65

S. Sambo

Defender

OPR 64

Tournament Probability

0.1%ChampionChampion

0.1%

39.7%Advance from GroupAdvance from Group

39.7%

Strengths

Top-class goalkeeper

Manager & Tactical Profile

· Appointed

Tournament Path Forecast

45.6%

Group

45.6%

R32

16.2%

R16

5.7%

1.8%

0.5%

Final

0.1%

Champion

Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.16

λ Attack

0.94

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

4.3

Star Gap

27.1

Avg Age

Top Scorer

B. Kuwas

5 goals

Best Rated

R. van Eijma

7.60

Club Clusters

Curaçao (4)Waalwijk (2)Telstar (2)FC Volendam (2)

WC Experience

Appearances0

Best FinishN/A

Last WC

First Timer!

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season1,331

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiMODERATE

MonterreyMODERATE

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score57/100

Total Clubs20

Same-Club Pairs9

Same-League300

Good — several familiar partnerships

H2H Matchup Predictions(48)

WinDrawLoss

Curaçao

0-1▼

60%

24%

16%

xG 1.7 – 0.8O2.5 46%BTTS 45%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

48%

26%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Qatar

1-1▼

46%

27%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Tunisia

1-1▼

44%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 43%BTTS 48%

Iran

1-1▼

44%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Jordan

1-1▼

44%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Ghana

1-1▼

44%

27%

29%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

43%

27%

30%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Iraq

0-1▼

43%

27%

31%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 47%

Panama

1-1▼

42%

28%

30%

xG 1.3 – 1.0O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Canada

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Scotland

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Norway

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Australia

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Ecuador

1-1▼

40%

28%

32%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Egypt

1-1▼

40%

28%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Uzbekistan

1-1▼

39%

28%

32%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

Morocco

1-1▼

39%

27%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

USA

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 49%

Paraguay

1-1▼

39%

29%

32%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 49%

Colombia

1-1▼

39%

27%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

New Zealand

1-1▼

38%

28%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Switzerland

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 51%

Sweden

1-1▼

38%

28%

35%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Congo DR

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Haiti

1-1▼

37%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 47%

South Africa

1-1▼

37%

28%

35%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Japan

1-1▼

36%

27%

36%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Senegal

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Croatia

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Uruguay

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Mexico

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Brazil

1-1▼

35%

26%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

Algeria

1-1▼

35%

28%

36%

xG 1.1 – 1.2O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Belgium

1-1▼

35%

28%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 51%

Netherlands

1-1▼

35%

27%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

South Korea

1-1▼

35%

30%

36%

xG 1.1 – 1.1O2.5 36%BTTS 44%

Germany

1-1▼

35%

25%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Argentina

1-1▼

35%

27%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Saudi Arabia

1-1▼

34%

28%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Austria

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Spain

1-1▼

34%

28%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

Türkiye

1-1▼

32%

27%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Portugal

1-1▼

31%

26%

43%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

England

1-1▼

31%

28%

42%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

France

1-1▼

30%

26%

44%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.16

λ Attack

0.94

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

4.3

Star Gap

27.1

Avg Age

Top Scorer

B. Kuwas

5 goals

Best Rated

R. van Eijma

7.60

Club Clusters

Curaçao (4)Waalwijk (2)Telstar (2)FC Volendam (2)

WC Experience

Appearances0

Best FinishN/A

Last WC

First Timer!

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season1,331

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiMODERATE

MonterreyMODERATE

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score57/100

Total Clubs20

Same-Club Pairs9

Same-League300

Good — several familiar partnerships

H2H Matchup Predictions(48)

WinDrawLoss

Curaçao

0-1▼

60%

24%

16%

xG 1.7 – 0.8O2.5 46%BTTS 45%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

48%

26%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Qatar

1-1▼

46%

27%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Tunisia

1-1▼

44%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 43%BTTS 48%

Iran

1-1▼

44%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Jordan

1-1▼

44%

28%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Ghana

1-1▼

44%

27%

29%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

43%

27%

30%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Iraq

0-1▼

43%

27%

31%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 47%

Panama

1-1▼

42%

28%

30%

xG 1.3 – 1.0O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Canada

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Scotland

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Norway

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Australia

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Ecuador

1-1▼

40%

28%

32%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Egypt

1-1▼

40%

28%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Uzbekistan

1-1▼

39%

28%

32%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

Morocco

1-1▼

39%

27%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

USA

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 49%

Paraguay

1-1▼

39%

29%

32%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 42%BTTS 49%

Colombia

1-1▼

39%

27%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

New Zealand

1-1▼

38%

28%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

Switzerland

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 51%

Sweden

1-1▼

38%

28%

35%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Congo DR

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 46%

Haiti

1-1▼

37%

28%

34%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 40%BTTS 47%

South Africa

1-1▼

37%

28%

35%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Japan

1-1▼

36%

27%

36%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Senegal

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Croatia

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Uruguay

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Mexico

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Brazil

1-1▼

35%

26%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

Algeria

1-1▼

35%

28%

36%

xG 1.1 – 1.2O2.5 42%BTTS 48%

Belgium

1-1▼

35%

28%

37%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 51%

Netherlands

1-1▼

35%

27%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

South Korea

1-1▼

35%

30%

36%

xG 1.1 – 1.1O2.5 36%BTTS 44%

Germany

1-1▼

35%

25%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Argentina

1-1▼

35%

27%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Saudi Arabia

1-1▼

34%

28%

38%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Austria

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Spain

1-1▼

34%

28%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

Türkiye

1-1▼

32%

27%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Portugal

1-1▼

31%

26%

43%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

England

1-1▼

31%

28%

42%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

France

1-1▼

30%

26%

44%

xG 1.1 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Curacao

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Star Players

Tournament Probability

Strengths

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(48)

Get 1 FREE Live AI Signal — No Delay

Curacao

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Star Players

Tournament Probability

Strengths

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(48)

Get 1 FREE Live AI Signal — No Delay