Will Sweden advance from the group stage at World Cup 2026?

OddsFlow AI gives Sweden a 69.6% probability of advancing from the group stage at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. This is based on Dixon-Coles modeling with Monte Carlo simulations across all group-stage scenarios.

Can Sweden win the 2026 World Cup?

Sweden has a 2.5% probability of winning the 2026 FIFA World Cup according to OddsFlow AI analysis. The team has an overall rating of 50/100 (Attack: 50, Midfield: 46, Defense: 47, Goalkeeping: 62).

What is Sweden's overall rating for World Cup 2026?

Sweden has an AI-generated overall rating of 50/100 for the 2026 World Cup. Breakdown: Attack 50, Midfield 46, Defense 47, Goalkeeping 62. Playing style: Balanced.

Who are Sweden's star players at World Cup 2026?

Sweden's top players for the 2026 World Cup include: G. Gudmundsson (Defender, OPR 70, 1G 1A (2939min)); G. Lagerbielke (Defender, OPR 67, 2G 0A (3636min)); V. Gyökeres (Attacker, OPR 66, 21G 3A (3503min)); C. Starfelt (Defender, OPR 63, 1G 0A (2402min)); B. Nygren (Attacker, OPR 63, 20G 6A (3406min)).

What are Sweden's strengths and weaknesses?

Weaknesses: Low team cohesion. Squad depth score: 83.0, average age: 26.5.

How strong is Sweden's squad for World Cup 2026?

Sweden's Dixon-Coles strength metrics: Attack power 49.3, Midfield control 45.7, Defensive solidity 46.8, GK rating 62.4. Lambda attack 1.18, lambda defense 1.22. Chemistry score 8, squad depth 83. Top scorer: V. Gyökeres (20 goals).

Sweden — World Cup 2026 AI Analysis (Rating 50/100)

OddsFlow AI Analysis

50Overall

Balanced

⚡Attack

⚙️Midfield

🛡️Defense

🧤Goalkeeping

25Squad Size

26.5Avg Age

56.7Avg OVR

83.0Depth Score

50Overall

Balanced

⚡Attack

⚙️Midfield

🛡️Defense

🧤Goalkeeping

25Squad Size

26.5Avg Age

56.7Avg OVR

83.0Depth Score

Star Players

G. Gudmundsson

Defender

1G 1A (2939min)

G. Lagerbielke

Defender

2G 0A (3636min)

V. Gyökeres

Attacker

21G 3A (3503min)

C. Starfelt

Defender

1G 0A (2402min)

B. Nygren

Attacker

20G 6A (3406min)

Tournament Probability

2.5%ChampionChampion

2.5%

69.6%Advance from GroupAdvance from Group

69.6%

Weaknesses

Low team cohesion

Manager & Tactical Profile

· Appointed

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.18

λ Attack

1.22

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

8.2

Star Gap

26.5

Avg Age

Top Scorer

V. Gyökeres

20 goals

Best Rated

E. Stroud

7.43

WC Experience

Appearances12

Best FinishRunner-up 1958

Last WC2018

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season1,963

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiLOW — humidity-adapted squad

MonterreyMODERATE — accustomed to humidity but not dry extreme heat

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score39/100

Total Clubs25

Same-Club Pairs0

Same-League94

Average — typical international squad

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

Iraq

0-1▼

55%

24%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%

South Korea

1-0▼

54%

24%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 48%

Curaçao

0-1▼

54%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%

Haiti

1-0▼

54%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 47%

Uzbekistan

0-1▼

54%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%

South Africa

0-1▼

54%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 48%

Iran

0-1▼

53%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 48%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

52%

24%

23%

xG 1.7 – 1.1O2.5 51%BTTS 53%

Egypt

1-1▼

50%

23%

26%

xG 1.7 – 1.2O2.5 55%BTTS 57%

Tunisia

1-1▼

46%

25%

29%

xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 53%BTTS 57%

Qatar

1-1▼

44%

27%

29%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Australia

1-1▼

44%

26%

30%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Mexico

1-1▼

44%

25%

31%

xG 1.6 – 1.3O2.5 56%BTTS 58%

New Zealand

1-1▼

44%

25%

31%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 51%BTTS 54%

Panama

1-1▼

44%

26%

30%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Saudi Arabia

1-1▼

43%

26%

31%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Ghana

1-1▼

43%

26%

31%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Jordan

1-1▼

43%

27%

30%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 48%

Algeria

1-1▼

42%

24%

34%

xG 1.6 – 1.4O2.5 56%BTTS 58%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

Canada

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 51%BTTS 54%

Congo DR

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Paraguay

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 55%

Ecuador

1-1▼

40%

27%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Norway

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Scotland

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Japan

1-1▼

39%

25%

36%

xG 1.4 – 1.4O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Morocco

1-1▼

38%

27%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

38%

27%

35%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

USA

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Colombia

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Austria

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Switzerland

1-1▼

37%

27%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Uruguay

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Senegal

1-1▼

36%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Croatia

1-1▼

36%

25%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Türkiye

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 50%BTTS 55%

Belgium

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 51%

Netherlands

1-1▼

34%

26%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Brazil

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Argentina

1-1▼

33%

26%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

England

1-1▼

33%

25%

42%

xG 1.3 – 1.5O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Germany

1-1▼

33%

25%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Portugal

1-1▼

32%

27%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Spain

1-1▼

32%

27%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

France

1-1▼

31%

26%

43%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 51%BTTS 54%

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.18

λ Attack

1.22

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

8.2

Star Gap

26.5

Avg Age

Top Scorer

V. Gyökeres

20 goals

Best Rated

E. Stroud

7.43

WC Experience

Appearances12

Best FinishRunner-up 1958

Last WC2018

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season1,963

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiLOW — humidity-adapted squad

MonterreyMODERATE — accustomed to humidity but not dry extreme heat

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score39/100

Total Clubs25

Same-Club Pairs0

Same-League94

Average — typical international squad

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

Iraq

0-1▼

55%

24%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%

South Korea

1-0▼

54%

24%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 48%

Curaçao

0-1▼

54%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%

Haiti

1-0▼

54%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 47%

Uzbekistan

0-1▼

54%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%

South Africa

0-1▼

54%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 48%

Iran

0-1▼

53%

25%

21%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 48%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

52%

24%

23%

xG 1.7 – 1.1O2.5 51%BTTS 53%

Egypt

1-1▼

50%

23%

26%

xG 1.7 – 1.2O2.5 55%BTTS 57%

Tunisia

1-1▼

46%

25%

29%

xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 53%BTTS 57%

Qatar

1-1▼

44%

27%

29%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Australia

1-1▼

44%

26%

30%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Mexico

1-1▼

44%

25%

31%

xG 1.6 – 1.3O2.5 56%BTTS 58%

New Zealand

1-1▼

44%

25%

31%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 51%BTTS 54%

Panama

1-1▼

44%

26%

30%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Saudi Arabia

1-1▼

43%

26%

31%

xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Ghana

1-1▼

43%

26%

31%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Jordan

1-1▼

43%

27%

30%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 48%

Algeria

1-1▼

42%

24%

34%

xG 1.6 – 1.4O2.5 56%BTTS 58%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

41%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

Canada

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 51%BTTS 54%

Congo DR

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Paraguay

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 55%

Ecuador

1-1▼

40%

27%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Norway

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Scotland

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Japan

1-1▼

39%

25%

36%

xG 1.4 – 1.4O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Morocco

1-1▼

38%

27%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

38%

27%

35%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

USA

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Colombia

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Austria

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Switzerland

1-1▼

37%

27%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

Uruguay

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Senegal

1-1▼

36%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Croatia

1-1▼

36%

25%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Türkiye

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 50%BTTS 55%

Belgium

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 51%

Netherlands

1-1▼

34%

26%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Brazil

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Argentina

1-1▼

33%

26%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

England

1-1▼

33%

25%

42%

xG 1.3 – 1.5O2.5 52%BTTS 55%

Germany

1-1▼

33%

25%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Portugal

1-1▼

32%

27%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Spain

1-1▼

32%

27%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

France

1-1▼

31%

26%

43%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 51%BTTS 54%

Sweden

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Star Players

Tournament Probability

Weaknesses

Manager & Tactical Profile

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

Get 1 FREE Live AI Signal — No Delay

Sweden

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Star Players

Tournament Probability

Weaknesses

Manager & Tactical Profile

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

Get 1 FREE Live AI Signal — No Delay