Will New Zealand advance from the group stage at World Cup 2026?

OddsFlow AI gives New Zealand a 70.9% probability of advancing from the group stage at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. This is based on Dixon-Coles modeling with Monte Carlo simulations across all group-stage scenarios.

Can New Zealand win the 2026 World Cup?

New Zealand has a 1.1% probability of winning the 2026 FIFA World Cup according to OddsFlow AI analysis. The team has an overall rating of 47/100 (Attack: 46, Midfield: 46, Defense: 42, Goalkeeping: 62).

What is New Zealand's overall rating for World Cup 2026?

New Zealand has an AI-generated overall rating of 47/100 for the 2026 World Cup. Breakdown: Attack 46, Midfield 46, Defense 42, Goalkeeping 62. Playing style: Balanced.

Who are New Zealand's star players at World Cup 2026?

New Zealand's top players for the 2026 World Cup include: M. Crocombe (Goalkeeper, OPR 70, OPR 70); B. Waine (Attacker, OPR 62, 4G 0A (536min)); F. de Vries (Defender, OPR 60, 2G 7A (2174min)); J. Bell (Midfielder, OPR 59, OPR 59); L. Cacace (Defender, OPR 59, 1G 0A (1133min)).

What are New Zealand's strengths and weaknesses?

Strengths: Strong team chemistry. Weaknesses: Defensive vulnerabilities. Squad depth score: 82.0, average age: 27.1.

What is New Zealand's full tournament path prediction for World Cup 2026?

New Zealand's tournament path probabilities: Group stage 57.3%, Round of 32 57.3%, Round of 16 20.4%, Quarter-finals 6.8%, Semi-finals 2.3%, Final 0.7%, Champion 0.2%. Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.

How strong is New Zealand's squad for World Cup 2026?

New Zealand's Dixon-Coles strength metrics: Attack power 45.2, Midfield control 45.2, Defensive solidity 41.2, GK rating 58.6. Lambda attack 1.09, lambda defense 1.40. Chemistry score 75, squad depth 82. Top scorer: C. Wood (5 goals).

New Zealand — World Cup 2026 AI Analysis (Rating 47/100)

OddsFlow AI Analysis

47종합

Balanced

⚡공격

⚙️미드필드

🛡️수비

🧤골키핑

26인원

27.1평균 나이

53.2평균 OVR

82.0깊이 점수

47종합

Balanced

⚡공격

⚙️미드필드

🛡️수비

🧤골키핑

26인원

27.1평균 나이

53.2평균 OVR

82.0깊이 점수

스타 선수

M. Crocombe

Goalkeeper

OPR 70

B. Waine

Attacker

4G 0A (536min)

F. de Vries

Defender

2G 7A (2174min)

J. Bell

Midfielder

OPR 59

L. Cacace

Defender

1G 0A (1133min)

대회 확률

1.1%우승우승

1.1%

70.9%조별 통과조별 통과

70.9%

강점

Strong team chemistry

약점

Defensive vulnerabilities

Manager & Tactical Profile

· Appointed

Tournament Path Forecast

57.3%

Group

57.3%

R32

20.4%

R16

6.8%

2.3%

0.7%

Final

0.2%

Champion

Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.09

λ Attack

1.40

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

11.7

Star Gap

27.1

Avg Age

Top Scorer

C. Wood

5 goals

Best Rated

F. de Vries

7.32

Club Clusters

Auckland (5)Wellington Phoenix (3)

WC Experience

Appearances2

Best FinishGroup Stage

Last WC2010

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season1,736

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiMODERATE

MonterreyMODERATE

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score60/100

Total Clubs20

Same-Club Pairs13

Same-League213

Good — several familiar partnerships

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

이라크

0-1▼

49%

26%

25%

xG 1.5 – 1.0O2.5 45%BTTS 48%

Iran

0-1▼

48%

25%

26%

xG 1.5 – 1.0O2.5 46%BTTS 49%

South Korea

1-0▼

48%

26%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 45%BTTS 48%

퀴라소

1-1▼

48%

26%

xG 1.5 – 1.0O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

우즈베키스탄

1-0▼

47%

26%

27%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 43%BTTS 47%

남아프리카

0-1▼

47%

26%

27%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 44%BTTS 48%

아이티

1-1▼

47%

26%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

45%

26%

29%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

카타르

1-1▼

44%

26%

30%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

이집트

1-1▼

43%

24%

32%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

가나

1-1▼

42%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

요르단

1-1▼

42%

27%

31%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

튀니지

1-1▼

41%

27%

31%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

파나마

1-1▼

40%

28%

32%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

노르웨이

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

호주

1-1▼

38%

25%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

에콰도르

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

캐나다

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 53%

콜롬비아

1-1▼

38%

28%

35%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

스코틀랜드

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

파라과이

1-1▼

37%

28%

35%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

37%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

사우디아라비아

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

멕시코

1-1▼

37%

25%

38%

xG 1.4 – 1.4O2.5 55%BTTS 58%

스웨덴

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

알제리

1-1▼

37%

24%

39%

xG 1.4 – 1.5O2.5 56%BTTS 59%

모로코

1-1▼

36%

28%

36%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

스위스

1-1▼

36%

28%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

미국

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

콩고민주공화국

1-1▼

36%

25%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

일본

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

크로아티아

1-1▼

34%

26%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

벨기에

1-1▼

34%

27%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

네덜란드

1-1▼

33%

26%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

33%

27%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

브라질

1-1▼

33%

26%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

세네갈

1-1▼

33%

26%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

우루과이

1-1▼

33%

27%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

아르헨티나

1-1▼

33%

26%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

오스트리아

1-1▼

33%

27%

41%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

독일

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

스페인

1-1▼

31%

27%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

튀르키예

1-1▼

31%

25%

44%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

잉글랜드

1-1▼

29%

26%

45%

xG 1.1 – 1.5O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

프랑스

1-1▼

28%

25%

47%

xG 1.1 – 1.5O2.5 49%BTTS 52%

포르투갈

1-1▼

28%

26%

46%

xG 1.1 – 1.5O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.09

λ Attack

1.40

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

11.7

Star Gap

27.1

Avg Age

Top Scorer

C. Wood

5 goals

Best Rated

F. de Vries

7.32

Club Clusters

Auckland (5)Wellington Phoenix (3)

WC Experience

Appearances2

Best FinishGroup Stage

Last WC2010

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season1,736

FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years

MiamiMODERATE

MonterreyMODERATE

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score60/100

Total Clubs20

Same-Club Pairs13

Same-League213

Good — several familiar partnerships

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

이라크

0-1▼

49%

26%

25%

xG 1.5 – 1.0O2.5 45%BTTS 48%

Iran

0-1▼

48%

25%

26%

xG 1.5 – 1.0O2.5 46%BTTS 49%

South Korea

1-0▼

48%

26%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 45%BTTS 48%

퀴라소

1-1▼

48%

26%

xG 1.5 – 1.0O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

우즈베키스탄

1-0▼

47%

26%

27%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 43%BTTS 47%

남아프리카

0-1▼

47%

26%

27%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 44%BTTS 48%

아이티

1-1▼

47%

26%

xG 1.4 – 1.0O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

45%

26%

29%

xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

카타르

1-1▼

44%

26%

30%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

이집트

1-1▼

43%

24%

32%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

가나

1-1▼

42%

27%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

요르단

1-1▼

42%

27%

31%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

튀니지

1-1▼

41%

27%

31%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 44%BTTS 49%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 50%

파나마

1-1▼

40%

28%

32%

xG 1.2 – 1.1O2.5 41%BTTS 47%

노르웨이

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

호주

1-1▼

38%

25%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

에콰도르

1-1▼

38%

28%

34%

xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 49%

캐나다

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 53%

콜롬비아

1-1▼

38%

28%

35%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

스코틀랜드

1-1▼

38%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

파라과이

1-1▼

37%

28%

35%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

37%

26%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

사우디아라비아

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

멕시코

1-1▼

37%

25%

38%

xG 1.4 – 1.4O2.5 55%BTTS 58%

스웨덴

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

알제리

1-1▼

37%

24%

39%

xG 1.4 – 1.5O2.5 56%BTTS 59%

모로코

1-1▼

36%

28%

36%

xG 1.2 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

스위스

1-1▼

36%

28%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

미국

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

콩고민주공화국

1-1▼

36%

25%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

일본

1-1▼

34%

27%

39%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 44%BTTS 50%

크로아티아

1-1▼

34%

26%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

벨기에

1-1▼

34%

27%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

네덜란드

1-1▼

33%

26%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

33%

27%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

브라질

1-1▼

33%

26%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

세네갈

1-1▼

33%

26%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

우루과이

1-1▼

33%

27%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.3O2.5 46%BTTS 51%

아르헨티나

1-1▼

33%

26%

41%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

오스트리아

1-1▼

33%

27%

41%

xG 1.1 – 1.3O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

독일

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

스페인

1-1▼

31%

27%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

튀르키예

1-1▼

31%

25%

44%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

잉글랜드

1-1▼

29%

26%

45%

xG 1.1 – 1.5O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

프랑스

1-1▼

28%

25%

47%

xG 1.1 – 1.5O2.5 49%BTTS 52%

포르투갈

1-1▼

28%

26%

46%

xG 1.1 – 1.5O2.5 47%BTTS 51%

뉴질랜드

OddsFlow AI Analysis

스타 선수

대회 확률

강점

약점

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

무료 라이브 AI 시그널 1경기 — 딜레이 없음

뉴질랜드

OddsFlow AI Analysis

스타 선수

대회 확률

강점

약점

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

무료 라이브 AI 시그널 1경기 — 딜레이 없음