AI
OddsFlow AI Analysis
Powered by Machine Learning
54Общий
Possession-basedTotal footballWell-drilled unit
⚡Атака
51
⚙️Полузащита
57
🛡️Защита
47
🧤Вратарь
62
26Размер
26.7Ср. возраст
62.7Ср. OVR
88.0Счёт глубины
54Общий
Possession-basedTotal footballWell-drilled unit
⚡Атака
51
⚙️Полузащита
57
🛡️Защита
47
🧤Вратарь
62
26Размер
26.7Ср. возраст
62.7Ср. OVR
88.0Счёт глубины
Звёздные игроки

A. Güler
Midfielder
8G 18A (4055min)

H. Çalhanoğlu
Midfielder
13G 9A (2582min)

U. Çakır
Goalkeeper
OPR 67

Ç. Söyüncü
Defender
OPR 67

M. Müldür
Defender
2G 2A (2413min)
Вероятность на турнире
2.3%ЧемпионЧемпион
2.3%
78.7%Выход из группыВыход из группы
78.7%
Сильные стороны
Strong team chemistry
Deep squad rotation
Manager & Tactical Profile
· Appointed
Tournament Path Forecast
79.6%
Group
79.6%
R32
43.0%
R16
22.3%
QF
12.0%
SF
5.9%
Final
2.8%
Champion
Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations
Team Strength & Intelligence
51
ATK
57
MID
47
DEF
62
GK
1.65
λ Attack
1.07
λ Defense
97
Chemistry
88
Depth
7.2
Star Gap
26.7
Avg Age
Top Scorer
K. Aktürkoğlu
15 goals
Best Rated
O. Kökçü
7.57
Club Clusters
Galatasaray (6)Fenerbahçe (6)
WC Experience
Appearances2
Best Finish3rd 2002
Last WC2002
Physical Resilience
Avg Mins/Season2,347
FatigueGood recovery — peak physical years
MiamiMODERATE
MonterreyMODERATE
Hot Climate %0%
Cooperation
Score70/100
Total Clubs16
Same-Club Pairs30
Same-League148
Excellent — strong club connections
H2H Matchup Predictions(48)
WinDrawLoss
Ирак
0-1▼
55%
25%
20%
xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 47%
Кюрасао
0-1▼
55%
25%
21%
xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 46%
South Korea
0-1▼
55%
25%
21%
xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%
Iran
0-1▼
54%
25%
21%
xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%
Cape Verde Islands
0-1▼
54%
24%
22%
xG 1.7 – 1.0O2.5 52%BTTS 53%
Гаити
0-1▼
54%
25%
21%
xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%
Узбекистан
0-1▼
54%
26%
21%
xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 47%
ЮАР
0-1▼
53%
25%
22%
xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 46%
Катар
1-1▼
52%
25%
23%
xG 1.6 – 1.0O2.5 49%BTTS 52%
Гана
1-1▼
51%
24%
25%
xG 1.6 – 1.1O2.5 51%BTTS 52%
Египет
1-1▼
50%
24%
26%
xG 1.7 – 1.2O2.5 54%BTTS 56%
Тунис
1-1▼
50%
25%
25%
xG 1.6 – 1.0O2.5 48%BTTS 51%
Иордания
1-1▼
49%
26%
25%
xG 1.5 – 1.0O2.5 46%BTTS 50%
Bosnia & Herzegovina
1-1▼
49%
24%
27%
xG 1.6 – 1.1O2.5 51%BTTS 52%
Панама
1-1▼
48%
27%
25%
xG 1.5 – 1.0O2.5 45%BTTS 49%
Шотландия
1-1▼
48%
24%
28%
xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 52%BTTS 54%
Эквадор
1-1▼
47%
26%
27%
xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 50%
Норвегия
1-1▼
46%
25%
29%
xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 52%BTTS 55%
Канада
1-1▼
46%
24%
30%
xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 53%BTTS 55%
Ivory Coast
1-1▼
45%
26%
29%
xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 53%
Марокко
1-1▼
45%
27%
28%
xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 52%
Австралия
1-1▼
45%
25%
30%
xG 1.5 – 1.1O2.5 48%BTTS 52%
США
1-1▼
45%
26%
30%
xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%
Колумбия
1-1▼
45%
26%
29%
xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 53%
Парагвай
1-1▼
45%
26%
30%
xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 47%BTTS 51%
Мексика
1-1▼
44%
25%
31%
xG 1.6 – 1.3O2.5 55%BTTS 57%
Новая Зеландия
1-1▼
44%
26%
30%
xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 48%BTTS 52%
Швеция
1-1▼
44%
25%
31%
xG 1.4 – 1.1O2.5 48%BTTS 52%
Швейцария
1-1▼
44%
26%
30%
xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%
Саудовская Аравия
1-1▼
44%
26%
30%
xG 1.5 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 54%
Алжир
1-1▼
44%
25%
32%
xG 1.6 – 1.3O2.5 55%BTTS 58%
ДР Конго
1-1▼
42%
27%
31%
xG 1.3 – 1.1O2.5 43%BTTS 49%
Япония
1-1▼
42%
25%
33%
xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 52%
Турция
1-1▼
42%
26%
32%
xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%
Бельгия
1-1▼
41%
26%
32%
xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%
Уругвай
1-1▼
41%
26%
32%
xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%
Сенегал
1-1▼
41%
26%
33%
xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 53%
Нидерланды
1-1▼
41%
26%
33%
xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%
Хорватия
1-1▼
40%
26%
34%
xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 51%BTTS 56%
Czech Republic
1-1▼
40%
26%
33%
xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 55%
Бразилия
1-1▼
40%
26%
34%
xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%
Австрия
1-1▼
40%
26%
34%
xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 47%BTTS 52%
Испания
1-1▼
39%
26%
35%
xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 53%
Аргентина
1-1▼
39%
27%
34%
xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 55%
Германия
1-1▼
39%
27%
35%
xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 55%
Англия
1-1▼
35%
26%
39%
xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%
Португалия
1-1▼
35%
27%
39%
xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%
Франция
1-1▼
34%
26%
40%
xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 54%
Sensitivity Analysis(51 scenarios)
Rank Distribution Across Scenarios
Travel ×0▼2
#5
Travel ×0.5▼2
#5
Travel ×0.25▼2
#5
Host ×0▼2
#5
Mismatch t=0.3 a=1.2▼2
#5
Heat ×1.25▼1
#6
Heat ×0.25▼1
#6
Altitude ×1.5▼1
#6
Travel ×1.25▼1
#6
Host ×0.5▼1
#6
Mismatch t=0.15 a=0.7▼1
#6
Mismatch t=0.2 a=0.9▼1
#6
Spread 2.5▼1
#6
Penalty rand=0.3▼1
#6
Baseline—
#7
Heat ×1.5—
#7
Heat ×2.5—
#7
Heat ×3—
#7
Heat ×1.75—
#7
Altitude ×0.75—
#7
Altitude ×2—
#7
Altitude ×3—
#7
Travel ×0.75—
#7
Spread 1—
#7
Spread 2.1—
#7
Uplift 1.15—
#7
Heat ×0▲1
#8
Heat ×0.5▲1
#8
Heat ×2▲1
#8
Altitude ×0▲1
#8
Altitude ×0.5▲1
#8
Altitude ×2.5▲1
#8
Altitude ×0.25▲1
#8
Altitude ×1.75▲1
#8
Mismatch t=0.1 a=0.5▲1
#8
Spread 1.5▲1
#8
Spread 3▲1
#8
Penalty rand=0.5▲1
#8
Penalty rand=0.7▲1
#8
Uplift 1▲1
#8
Heat ×0.75▲2
#9
Altitude ×1.25▲2
#9
Travel ×1.5▲2
#9
Travel ×2▲2
#9
Travel ×2.5▲2
#9
Travel ×3▲2
#9
Travel ×1.75▲2
#9
Host ×1.5▲2
#9
Host ×2▲2
#9
Host ×3▲2
#9
Mismatch t=0.05 a=0.3▲2
#9
Baseline: #7·Lower rank = stronger
baseline
1 scenarios · #7
heat
10 scenarios · #6–#9
altitude
10 scenarios · #6–#9
travel
10 scenarios · #5–#9
host
5 scenarios · #5–#9
mismatch
5 scenarios · #5–#9
spread
5 scenarios · #6–#8
penalty
3 scenarios · #6–#8
uplift
2 scenarios · #7–#8