Will Scotland advance from the group stage at World Cup 2026?

OddsFlow AI gives Scotland a 64.0% probability of advancing from the group stage at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. This is based on Dixon-Coles modeling with Monte Carlo simulations across all group-stage scenarios.

Can Scotland win the 2026 World Cup?

Scotland has a 0.6% probability of winning the 2026 FIFA World Cup according to OddsFlow AI analysis. The team has an overall rating of 48/100 (Attack: 48, Midfield: 48, Defense: 46, Goalkeeping: 48).

What is Scotland's overall rating for World Cup 2026?

Scotland has an AI-generated overall rating of 48/100 for the 2026 World Cup. Breakdown: Attack 48, Midfield 48, Defense 46, Goalkeeping 48. Playing style: Balanced.

Who are Scotland's star players at World Cup 2026?

Scotland's top players for the 2026 World Cup include: R. Stewart (Attacker, OPR 68, 11G 3A (1352min)); A. Hickey (Defender, OPR 66, 1G 0A (1104min)); K. McLean (Midfielder, OPR 66, 3G 4A (3899min)); K. Tierney (Defender, OPR 65, 6G 9A (3628min)); D. Hyam (Defender, OPR 64, 1G 0A (4055min)).

What are Scotland's strengths and weaknesses?

Weaknesses: Uncertain goalkeeper. Squad depth score: 84.0, average age: 28.6.

What is Scotland's full tournament path prediction for World Cup 2026?

Scotland's tournament path probabilities: Group stage 66.4%, Round of 32 66.4%, Round of 16 32.9%, Quarter-finals 15.7%, Semi-finals 7.2%, Final 3.4%, Champion 1.4%. Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.

How strong is Scotland's squad for World Cup 2026?

Scotland's Dixon-Coles strength metrics: Attack power 48.1, Midfield control 48.3, Defensive solidity 46.1, GK rating 62.3. Lambda attack 1.23, lambda defense 1.20. Chemistry score 25, squad depth 84. Top scorer: S. McTominay (14 goals).

Scotland — World Cup 2026 AI Analysis (Rating 48/100)

OddsFlow AI Analysis

48Global

Balanced

⚡Attaque

⚙️Milieu

🛡️Défense

🧤Gardien

26Taille

28.6Âge Moy.

56.8OVR Moy.

84.0Score Prof.

48Global

Balanced

⚡Attaque

⚙️Milieu

🛡️Défense

🧤Gardien

26Taille

28.6Âge Moy.

56.8OVR Moy.

84.0Score Prof.

Joueurs Vedettes

R. Stewart

Attacker

11G 3A (1352min)

A. Hickey

Defender

1G 0A (1104min)

K. McLean

Midfielder

3G 4A (3899min)

K. Tierney

Defender

6G 9A (3628min)

D. Hyam

Defender

1G 0A (4055min)

Probabilité du Tournoi

0.6%ChampionChampion

0.6%

64.0%Sortir du GroupeSortir du Groupe

64.0%

Faiblesses

Uncertain goalkeeper

Manager & Tactical Profile

· Appointed

Tournament Path Forecast

66.4%

Group

66.4%

R32

32.9%

R16

15.7%

7.2%

3.4%

Final

1.4%

Champion

Based on 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.23

λ Attack

1.20

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

6.2

Star Gap

28.6

Avg Age

Top Scorer

S. McTominay

14 goals

Best Rated

K. McLean

7.23

Club Clusters

Celtic (2)Rangers (2)Heart Of Midlothian (2)

WC Experience

Appearances8

Best FinishGroup Stage

Last WC1998

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season2,041

FatigueAverage recovery — some concern in 3rd group match

MiamiMODERATE

MonterreyMODERATE

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score34/100

Total Clubs22

Same-Club Pairs3

Same-League63

Low — scattered across many clubs

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

Curaçao

1-0▼

53%

25%

22%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 47%

Irak

0-1▼

52%

25%

23%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%

Haïti

0-1▼

52%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

South Korea

1-0▼

52%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

Ouzbékistan

0-1▼

51%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

Iran

0-1▼

51%

25%

24%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 48%

Afrique du Sud

0-1▼

51%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

50%

25%

xG 1.6 – 1.1O2.5 51%BTTS 53%

Égypte

1-1▼

47%

24%

28%

xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

Qatar

1-1▼

43%

25%

31%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Tunisie

1-1▼

43%

25%

32%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 53%BTTS 57%

Panama

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Arabie saoudite

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Nouvelle-Zélande

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Australie

1-1▼

41%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Ghana

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Mexique

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

Jordanie

1-1▼

41%

27%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

Algérie

1-1▼

40%

25%

35%

xG 1.5 – 1.4O2.5 54%BTTS 58%

RD Congo

1-1▼

40%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

40%

26%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Canada

1-1▼

39%

26%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Paraguay

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Équateur

1-1▼

38%

27%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Norvège

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.4 – 1.4O2.5 50%BTTS 55%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Japon

1-1▼

37%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

États-Unis

1-1▼

37%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Maroc

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Colombie

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Autriche

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Suède

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Suisse

1-1▼

35%

26%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Sénégal

1-1▼

35%

26%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Croatie

1-1▼

35%

26%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Turquie

1-1▼

34%

26%

40%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Uruguay

1-1▼

34%

26%

40%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Belgique

1-1▼

33%

27%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Pays-Bas

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Argentine

1-1▼

32%

25%

43%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Portugal

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Brésil

1-1▼

32%

25%

43%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Allemagne

1-1▼

31%

26%

43%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Espagne

1-1▼

31%

25%

44%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 52%

Angleterre

1-1▼

31%

26%

44%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

France

1-1▼

30%

25%

45%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Team Strength & Intelligence

ATK

MID

DEF

1.23

λ Attack

1.20

λ Defense

Chemistry

Depth

6.2

Star Gap

28.6

Avg Age

Top Scorer

S. McTominay

14 goals

Best Rated

K. McLean

7.23

Club Clusters

Celtic (2)Rangers (2)Heart Of Midlothian (2)

WC Experience

Appearances8

Best FinishGroup Stage

Last WC1998

Physical Resilience

Avg Mins/Season2,041

FatigueAverage recovery — some concern in 3rd group match

MiamiMODERATE

MonterreyMODERATE

Hot Climate %0%

Cooperation

Score34/100

Total Clubs22

Same-Club Pairs3

Same-League63

Low — scattered across many clubs

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

WinDrawLoss

Curaçao

1-0▼

53%

25%

22%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 47%

Irak

0-1▼

52%

25%

23%

xG 1.6 – 0.9O2.5 46%BTTS 47%

Haïti

0-1▼

52%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

South Korea

1-0▼

52%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

Ouzbékistan

0-1▼

51%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

Iran

0-1▼

51%

25%

24%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 45%BTTS 48%

Afrique du Sud

0-1▼

51%

26%

23%

xG 1.5 – 0.9O2.5 44%BTTS 47%

Cape Verde Islands

1-1▼

50%

25%

xG 1.6 – 1.1O2.5 51%BTTS 53%

Égypte

1-1▼

47%

24%

28%

xG 1.6 – 1.2O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

Qatar

1-1▼

43%

25%

31%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Tunisie

1-1▼

43%

25%

32%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 53%BTTS 57%

Panama

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Arabie saoudite

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Nouvelle-Zélande

1-1▼

42%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Australie

1-1▼

41%

26%

32%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Ghana

1-1▼

41%

26%

33%

xG 1.4 – 1.2O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Mexique

1-1▼

41%

25%

34%

xG 1.5 – 1.3O2.5 54%BTTS 57%

Jordanie

1-1▼

41%

27%

33%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 46%BTTS 52%

Algérie

1-1▼

40%

25%

35%

xG 1.5 – 1.4O2.5 54%BTTS 58%

RD Congo

1-1▼

40%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Bosnia & Herzegovina

1-1▼

40%

26%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Canada

1-1▼

39%

26%

34%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Paraguay

1-1▼

39%

26%

35%

xG 1.4 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Équateur

1-1▼

38%

27%

36%

xG 1.3 – 1.2O2.5 45%BTTS 50%

Norvège

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.4 – 1.4O2.5 50%BTTS 55%

Czech Republic

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Ivory Coast

1-1▼

37%

26%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Japon

1-1▼

37%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 51%BTTS 55%

États-Unis

1-1▼

37%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Maroc

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Colombie

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Autriche

1-1▼

36%

27%

37%

xG 1.3 – 1.3O2.5 47%BTTS 52%

Suède

1-1▼

36%

26%

38%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Suisse

1-1▼

35%

26%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Sénégal

1-1▼

35%

26%

39%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 54%

Croatie

1-1▼

35%

26%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Turquie

1-1▼

34%

26%

40%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Uruguay

1-1▼

34%

26%

40%

xG 1.3 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Belgique

1-1▼

33%

27%

40%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Pays-Bas

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 53%

Argentine

1-1▼

32%

25%

43%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

Portugal

1-1▼

32%

26%

42%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Brésil

1-1▼

32%

25%

43%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Allemagne

1-1▼

31%

26%

43%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 48%BTTS 52%

Espagne

1-1▼

31%

25%

44%

xG 1.2 – 1.4O2.5 49%BTTS 52%

Angleterre

1-1▼

31%

26%

44%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 50%BTTS 54%

France

1-1▼

30%

25%

45%

xG 1.2 – 1.5O2.5 49%BTTS 53%

Écosse

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Joueurs Vedettes

Probabilité du Tournoi

Faiblesses

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

1 Signal AI en Direct GRATUIT — Sans Délai

Écosse

OddsFlow AI Analysis

Joueurs Vedettes

Probabilité du Tournoi

Faiblesses

Manager & Tactical Profile

Tournament Path Forecast

Team Strength & Intelligence

H2H Matchup Predictions(47)

1 Signal AI en Direct GRATUIT — Sans Délai