Lecce
Lecce hosted Juventus in the Serie A, finishing 0-1. Goals: D. Vlahovic (1'), D. Vlahovic (48'), P. Kalulu (59'). OddsFlow deployed 7 trades across 2 waves, achieving 100% precision with a net result of +$5068.10 (ROI: +133.0%).
The Asian Handicap line moved from 1 to 1.25; the Over/Under line shifted from 2.75 to 2.5; the home moneyline drifted out from 6.12 to 8.34.
### Wave 1 — Minute 21' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Juventus leading 0-1 at 21'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Lecce +1.5. Average expected value was 34.3%, with a combined stake of $200. The sharpest edge was on Lecce +1.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 75.3% probability versus the market's implied 43.5% — a 31.8 percentage point gap at odds of 2.3. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$260.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 25' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Juventus leading 0-1 at 25'. 3 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10, system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Over/Under markets, targeting Lecce +1.5 and Under 2.5. Average expected value was 22.4%, with a combined stake of $3612. The sharpest edge was on Lecce +1.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 77.9% probability versus the market's implied 43.5% — a 34.4 percentage point gap at odds of 2.3. **Result:** All 6 trades won, netting +$4808.10.
- **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Lecce +1.5: AI saw 77.9% vs market's 43.5% (34.4pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Lecce +1.5: AI saw 77.5% vs market's 43.5% (34.1pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Lecce +1.5: AI saw 77.5% vs market's 43.5% (34.0pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 21'** — Asian Handicap Lecce +1.5: AI saw 75.3% vs market's 43.5% (31.8pp gap). correctly identified.
- **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 2 trades, 2W/0L, +$1607.90 (ROI: +133.1%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 2 trades, 2W/0L, +$1600.10 (ROI: +133.1%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 2 trades, 2W/0L, +$1600.10 (ROI: +133.1%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 1 trades, 1W/0L, +$260.00 (ROI: +130.0%)
Possession was 34–66 in Lecce's deficit. Lecce had 8 shots (3 on target) versus Juventus's 13 (4 on target). Expected goals: Lecce 0.86 — Juventus 1.93. Corners: 1-7.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +133.0% ROI. Top performer: system4_HYBRID_v10 at +$1607.90.
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Away | 12.0% / 21.4% / 69.9% |
| Asian handicap | +1.25 | 51.5% |
| Over / Under | 2.5 | 52.1% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
The market significantly overestimated the likelihood of Over 2.5 goals.
The match between Lecce and Juventus concluded 0-1, with Juventus securing the win. The 1x2 market correctly identified Juventus as the heavy favorite (69.93% implied probability) and the outcome aligned. In the Asian Handicap market, the line was set at 1.25, with Lecce (+1.25) having a slight edge in implied probability (51.55%). Lecce ultimately covered the spread, indicating the market was efficient in this regard. However, the most notable **market inefficiency** was found in the Totals market. Despite a closing line of 2.5 goals, the market leaned towards the Over (52.08% probability). The final score of 0-1 resulted in only 1 total goal, a clear **Under 2.5** outcome. This represented a significant **value signal** for bettors backing the Under.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +133.0% ROI on 7 trades. Top performer: Oddsflow Beta at +$1607.90.
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.