Juventus
Juventus hosted Bologna in the Serie A, finishing 2-0. Goals: J. David (2'), K. Thuram (57'). OddsFlow deployed 6 trades across 4 waves, achieving 50% precision with a net result of +$2124.00 (ROI: +52.3%).
The Asian Handicap held at -1.25 but home odds shifted from 2.08 to 2.03.
### Wave 1 — Minute 25' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Juventus leading 1-0 at 25'. 3 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_HYBRID_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Bologna -1.5. Average expected value was 28.3%, with a combined stake of $1770. The sharpest edge was on Bologna -1.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 71.6% probability versus the market's implied 45.5% — a 26.2 percentage point gap at odds of 2.2. **Result:** All 3 trades won, netting +$2124.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 34' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Juventus leading 1-0 at 34'. 1 model (system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Bologna -1. Average expected value was 30.7%, with a combined stake of $697. The sharpest edge was on Bologna -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 75.4% probability versus the market's implied 47.6% — a 27.8 percentage point gap at odds of 2.1. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 38' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Juventus leading 1-0 at 38'. 1 model (system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Bologna -1. Average expected value was 32.8%, with a combined stake of $746. The sharpest edge was on Bologna -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 77.5% probability versus the market's implied 47.6% — a 29.9 percentage point gap at odds of 2.1. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 47' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Juventus leading 1-0 at 47'. 1 model (system4_MC_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Bologna -1. Average expected value was 37.4%, with a combined stake of $849. The sharpest edge was on Bologna -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 82.1% probability versus the market's implied 47.6% — a 34.5 percentage point gap at odds of 2.1. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00.
- **Minute 47'** — Asian Handicap Bologna -1: AI saw 82.1% vs market's 47.6% (34.5pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 38'** — Asian Handicap Bologna -1: AI saw 77.5% vs market's 47.6% (29.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 34'** — Asian Handicap Bologna -1: AI saw 75.4% vs market's 47.6% (27.8pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Bologna -1.5: AI saw 71.6% vs market's 45.5% (26.2pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Bologna -1.5: AI saw 71.1% vs market's 45.5% (25.7pp gap). correctly identified.
- **system4_MC_v10**: 2 trades, 1W/0L/1V, +$718.80 (ROI: +49.6%) - **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 2 trades, 1W/0L/1V, +$706.80 (ROI: +55.0%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 2 trades, 1W/0L/1V, +$698.40 (ROI: +52.6%)
Possession was 57%–43% in Juventus's favor. Juventus had 14 shots (4 on target) versus Bologna's 7 (0 on target). Expected goals: Juventus 1.1 — Bologna 0.54. Corners: 6-1.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +52.3% ROI. Top performer: system4_MC_v10 at +$718.80.
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 68.5% / 21.1% / 13.9% |
| Asian handicap | -1.25 | 52.6% |
| Over / Under | 2.75 | 52.4% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
The market significantly underestimated the probability of Under 2.75 goals.
The match concluded with Juventus defeating Bologna 2-0. The 1x2 market accurately priced Juventus as the clear favorite with a 68.49% implied probability of victory, which materialized. In the Handicap market, Juventus -1.25, priced at 49.26% probability, covered the spread as they won by two goals. However, the market slightly favored Bologna +1.25 at 52.63%, indicating a slight misjudgment. The most notable market inefficiency was observed in the Totals market (Over/Under 2.75 goals). The closing line implied a slight lean towards the Over with 52.36% probability, yet the match finished with only 2 goals, resulting in a clear Under. This represents a significant Closing Line Value opportunity for bettors backing the Under.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +52.3% ROI on 6 trades. Top performer: HDP Sniper at +$718.80.
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.