Hellas Verona
Hellas Verona hosted Como in the Serie A, finishing 0-1. Goals: A. Douvikas (71'). OddsFlow deployed 7 trades across 2 waves, achieving 43% precision with a net result of +$971.56 (ROI: +32.5%).
The Asian Handicap held at 1.25 but home odds shifted from 1.82 to 1.95; the Over/Under stayed at 2.5 with Over odds moving from 1.89 to 1.95; the home moneyline drifted out from 6.59 to 8.49.
### Wave 1 — Minute 0' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 0'. 1 model (S5.1_Pre) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 2.5. Average expected value was 10.9%, with a combined stake of $292. The sharpest edge was on Under 2.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 57.5% probability versus the market's implied 51.8% — a 5.6 percentage point gap at odds of 1.93. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$271.56. ### Wave 2 — Minute 41' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 41'. 3 models (oddsflow_core_v8.1, system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline and Over/Under markets, targeting Como +1 and Draw and Under 1.5. Average expected value was 14.7%, with a combined stake of $2700. The sharpest edge was on Under 1.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 62.8% probability versus the market's implied 45.5% — a 17.3 percentage point gap at odds of 2.2. **Result:** 2 of 6 trades won, netting +$700.00.
- **Minute 41'** — Over/Under Under 1.5: AI saw 62.8% vs market's 45.5% (17.3pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 41'** — Over/Under Under 1.5: AI saw 62.3% vs market's 45.5% (16.8pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 41'** — Asian Handicap Como +1: AI saw 51.7% vs market's 40.0% (11.7pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 41'** — Asian Handicap Como +1: AI saw 51.5% vs market's 40.0% (11.5pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 41'** — Asian Handicap Como +1: AI saw 50.9% vs market's 40.0% (10.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.
- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 2 trades, 1W/0L/1V, +$600.00 (ROI: +60.0%) - **S5.1_Pre**: 1 trades, 1W/0L, +$271.56 (ROI: +93.0%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 3 trades, 1W/1L/1V, +$100.00 (ROI: +6.7%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 1 trades, 0W/0L/1V, +$0.00 (ROI: +0.0%)
Possession was 35–65 in Hellas Verona's deficit. Hellas Verona had 10 shots (2 on target) versus Como's 11 (4 on target). Expected goals: Hellas Verona 0.95 — Como 0.9. Corners: 5-7.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.5% ROI. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at +$600.00.
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Away | 11.8% / 20.9% / 71.4% |
| Asian handicap | +1.25 | 51.3% |
| Over / Under | 2.5 | 51.3% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
The Asian Handicap market significantly misjudged Como's winning margin, presenting an EV+ opportunity on Hellas Verona +1.25.
The Serie A fixture between Hellas Verona and Como concluded 0-1. The 1x2 market correctly identified Como as the strong favorite with a 71.43% win probability, aligning with the actual away victory. However, the Asian Handicap market at a line of 1.25 proved inefficient. While Como secured the win, their 1-goal margin meant they failed to cover the -1.25 handicap. OddsFlow analysis indicates a significant Closing Line Value (CLV) opportunity on Hellas Verona +1.25, as the market underestimated their ability to keep the score tight. The Totals (O/U 2.5) market was relatively efficient, with the 1 total goal correctly falling under the line, aligning with the market's slight lean towards the Under (51.81%).
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.5% ROI on 7 trades. Top performer: Active Trader at +$600.00.
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.