Full Time
Serie A · Stadio Marcantonio Bentegodi, Verona · 2026-05-10

Hellas VeronaHellas Verona
0 - 1
ComoComo

+$971.56
Match Precision75%
Signal Hit Rate3/7
Model Lineup
Active Trader
+$600
★★★★★
1W-0L · 100%
PreMatch Edge
+$272
★★★★★
1W-0L · 100%
🎯
HDP Sniper
+$100
★★☆☆☆
1W-1L · 50%
🛡️
Oddsflow Core Strategy
+$0
☆☆☆☆
0W-0L · 0%
🧠 Key Question

Why did AI enter 2 times at 0', 41' — and still finish +$972?

Trade Story

Match Overview

Hellas Verona hosted Como in the Serie A, finishing 0-1. Goals: A. Douvikas (71'). OddsFlow deployed 7 trades across 2 waves, achieving 43% precision with a net result of +$971.56 (ROI: +32.5%).

Pre-Match Odds

The Asian Handicap held at 1.25 but home odds shifted from 1.82 to 1.95; the Over/Under stayed at 2.5 with Over odds moving from 1.89 to 1.95; the home moneyline drifted out from 6.59 to 8.49.

Trade Wave Analysis

### Wave 1 — Minute 0' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 0'. 1 model (S5.1_Pre) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 2.5. Average expected value was 10.9%, with a combined stake of $292. The sharpest edge was on Under 2.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 57.5% probability versus the market's implied 51.8% — a 5.6 percentage point gap at odds of 1.93. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$271.56. ### Wave 2 — Minute 41' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 41'. 3 models (oddsflow_core_v8.1, system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline and Over/Under markets, targeting Como +1 and Draw and Under 1.5. Average expected value was 14.7%, with a combined stake of $2700. The sharpest edge was on Under 1.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 62.8% probability versus the market's implied 45.5% — a 17.3 percentage point gap at odds of 2.2. **Result:** 2 of 6 trades won, netting +$700.00.

Key Mispricing Moments

- **Minute 41'** — Over/Under Under 1.5: AI saw 62.8% vs market's 45.5% (17.3pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 41'** — Over/Under Under 1.5: AI saw 62.3% vs market's 45.5% (16.8pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 41'** — Asian Handicap Como +1: AI saw 51.7% vs market's 40.0% (11.7pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 41'** — Asian Handicap Como +1: AI saw 51.5% vs market's 40.0% (11.5pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 41'** — Asian Handicap Como +1: AI saw 50.9% vs market's 40.0% (10.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.

Model Performance

- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 2 trades, 1W/0L/1V, +$600.00 (ROI: +60.0%) - **S5.1_Pre**: 1 trades, 1W/0L, +$271.56 (ROI: +93.0%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 3 trades, 1W/1L/1V, +$100.00 (ROI: +6.7%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 1 trades, 0W/0L/1V, +$0.00 (ROI: +0.0%)

Match Statistics

Possession was 35–65 in Hellas Verona's deficit. Hellas Verona had 10 shots (2 on target) versus Como's 11 (4 on target). Expected goals: Hellas Verona 0.95 — Como 0.9. Corners: 5-7.

🏆

Verdict

A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.5% ROI. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at +$600.00.

Market Efficiency

What the closing market expected

The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.

MarketLineImplied probability
1X2 (home / draw / away)Favourite: Away11.8% / 20.9% / 71.4%
Asian handicap+1.2551.3%
Over / Under2.551.3%

Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.

Where the market was wrong

The Asian Handicap market significantly misjudged Como's winning margin, presenting an EV+ opportunity on Hellas Verona +1.25.

The Serie A fixture between Hellas Verona and Como concluded 0-1. The 1x2 market correctly identified Como as the strong favorite with a 71.43% win probability, aligning with the actual away victory. However, the Asian Handicap market at a line of 1.25 proved inefficient. While Como secured the win, their 1-goal margin meant they failed to cover the -1.25 handicap. OddsFlow analysis indicates a significant Closing Line Value (CLV) opportunity on Hellas Verona +1.25, as the market underestimated their ability to keep the score tight. The Totals (O/U 2.5) market was relatively efficient, with the 1 total goal correctly falling under the line, aligning with the market's slight lean towards the Under (51.81%).

Trade Waves
Match Timeline
36'🔄
V
A. Valle(assist: A. Moreno)Como
46'🔄
V
M. Vojvoda(assist: I. Smolcic)Como
46'🔄
R
J. Rodriguez(assist: M. Baturina)Como
46'🔄
P
M. Perrone(assist: M. Caqueret)Como
63'🔄
B
A. Bernede(assist: S. Lovric)Hellas Verona
81'🔄
A
J. Akpa Akpro(assist: Isaac)Hellas Verona
81'🔄
D
A. Diao(assist: I. Van der Brempt)Como
81'🔄
B
R. Belghali(assist: I. Vermesan)Hellas Verona
Odds Movement
Key Mispricing
Match Statistics
Pre-Match Odds
Verdict

A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.5% ROI on 7 trades. Top performer: Active Trader at +$600.00.

See AI signals as they happen

This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.