Full Time
Serie A · Stadio Giuseppe Meazza, Milan · 2026-04-11

AC MilanAC Milan
0 - 3
UdineseUdinese

$-1677.40
Match Precision29%
Signal Hit Rate2/7
Model Lineup
Active Trader
$-661
☆☆☆☆
1W-2L · 33%
🎯
HDP Sniper
$-1017
☆☆☆☆
1W-3L · 25%
🧠 Key Question

Why did AI enter 2 times at 25', 37' — and still finish $-1677?

Trade Story

Match Overview

AC Milan hosted Udinese in the Serie A, finishing 0-3. Goals: A. Atta (27'), D. Bartesaghi (27' OG), J. Ekkelenkamp (37'), A. Atta (71'). OddsFlow deployed 7 trades across 2 waves, achieving 29% precision with a net result of $-1677.40 (ROI: -43.2%).

Pre-Match Odds

The Asian Handicap held at -1.25 but home odds shifted from 1.86 to 1.96; the Over/Under line shifted from 2.75 to 2.5.

Trade Wave Analysis

### Wave 1 — Minute 25' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 25'. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Udinese -1 and AC Milan -0.5. Average expected value was 23.0%, with a combined stake of $2227. The sharpest edge was on AC Milan -0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 62.8% probability versus the market's implied 38.5% — a 24.3 percentage point gap at odds of 2.6. **Result:** 2 of 4 trades won, netting $-18.40. ### Wave 2 — Minute 37' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Udinese leading 0-1 at 37'. J. Ekkelenkamp scored moments ago. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline markets, targeting AC Milan +0.5 and Draw. Average expected value was 36.4%, with a combined stake of $1659. The sharpest edge was on AC Milan +0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 89.0% probability versus the market's implied 40.0% — a 49.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.5. **Result:** All 3 trades lost, netting $-1659.00.

Key Mispricing Moments

- **Minute 37'** — Asian Handicap AC Milan +0.5: AI saw 89.0% vs market's 40.0% (49.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 37'** — Asian Handicap AC Milan +0.5: AI saw 89.0% vs market's 40.0% (49.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 27'** — Asian Handicap AC Milan -0.5: AI saw 62.8% vs market's 38.5% (24.3pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 27'** — Asian Handicap AC Milan -0.5: AI saw 62.5% vs market's 38.5% (24.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Udinese -1: AI saw 73.2% vs market's 55.6% (17.6pp gap). correctly identified.

Model Performance

- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 3 trades, 1W/2L, $-660.80 (ROI: -37.8%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 4 trades, 1W/3L, $-1016.60 (ROI: -47.5%)

Match Statistics

Possession was 63%–37% in AC Milan's favor. AC Milan had 20 shots (3 on target) versus Udinese's 12 (6 on target). Expected goals: AC Milan 1.66 — Udinese 1.24. Corners: 4-3.

🏆

Verdict

A tough session at -43.2% ROI. The market moved against OddsFlow's positions, though the underlying probability assessments may still prove correct over a larger sample. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at $-660.80.

Market Efficiency

What the closing market expected

The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.

MarketLineImplied probability
1X2 (home / draw / away)Favourite: Home71.4% / 21.1% / 11.3%
Asian handicap-1.2551.0%
Over / Under2.553.2%

Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.

Where the market was wrong

The outright Udinese win in the 1x2 market was a massive value signal.

AC Milan suffered an unexpected 0-3 home defeat to Udinese. The 1x2 market heavily favored AC Milan, assigning them a 71.43% implied win probability, while Udinese's outright victory held only an 11.26% chance. This outcome represents a significant market inefficiency and immense Closing Line Value (CLV) for those who backed Udinese. On the Asian Handicap of AC Milan -1.25, the probabilities were balanced at 51.02% for both sides. Udinese's dominant 3-0 win meant they easily covered the spread (Udinese +1.25), highlighting another mispricing. The Goals Over/Under 2.5 market showed a slight lean towards the Over (53.19% probability), and with 3 total goals, this market was relatively more efficient, though the exact distribution of goals (0 for Milan) was certainly unforeseen.

Trade Waves
Match Timeline
46'🔄
A
Z. Athekame(assist: N. Fullkrug)AC Milan
60'🔄
R
S. Ricci(assist: Y. Fofana)AC Milan
66'🔄
Z
N. Zaniolo(assist: J. Piotrowski)Udinese
72'🔄
P
C. Pulisic(assist: C. Nkunku)AC Milan
72'🔄
M
L. Modric(assist: A. Jashari)AC Milan
73'🔄
P
C. Pulisic(assist: C. Nkunku)AC Milan
73'🔄
M
L. Modric(assist: A. Jashari)AC Milan
76'🔄
D
K. Davis(assist: I. Gueye)Udinese
77'🔄
L
R. Leao(assist: R. Loftus-Cheek)AC Milan
85'🔄
A
A. Atta(assist: O. Zarraga)Udinese
86'🔄
E
J. Ekkelenkamp(assist: L. Miller)Udinese
Odds Movement
Key Mispricing
Match Statistics
Pre-Match Odds
Verdict

A tough session at -43.2% ROI. The market moved against OddsFlow's positions. Top performer: Active Trader at $-660.80.

See AI signals as they happen

This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.