AC Milan
AC Milan hosted Cagliari in the Serie A, finishing 1-2. Goals: A. Saelemaekers (2'), G. Borrelli (20'), J. Rodriguez (57'). OddsFlow deployed 21 trades across 6 waves, achieving 62% precision with a net result of +$636.90 (ROI: +32.8%).
The Asian Handicap held at -1.5 but home odds shifted from 1.9 to 1.98.
### Wave 1 — Minute 0' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 0'. 1 model (S5.1_Pre) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Cagliari -1.5. Average expected value was 38.0%, with a combined stake of $60. The sharpest edge was on Cagliari -1.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 68.8% probability versus the market's implied 48.3% — a 20.5 percentage point gap at odds of 2.07. **Result:** All 2 trades won, netting +$62.90. ### Wave 2 — Minute 21' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1 after G. Borrelli's equalizer at 20'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Cagliari -1. Average expected value was 43.2%, with a combined stake of $214. The sharpest edge was on Cagliari -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 78.0% probability versus the market's implied 49.3% — a 28.7 percentage point gap at odds of 2.03. **Result:** All 2 trades won, netting +$208.45. ### Wave 3 — Minute 35' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1 after G. Borrelli's equalizer at 20'. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Over/Under and Asian Handicap markets, targeting Under 3.5 and Cagliari -1. Average expected value was 38.0%, with a combined stake of $678. The sharpest edge was on Cagliari -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 83.1% probability versus the market's implied 49.3% — a 33.8 percentage point gap at odds of 2.03. **Result:** All 6 trades won, netting +$681.45. ### Wave 4 — Minute 43' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 43'. 3 models (system4_BLEND_v10, oddsflow_core_v8.1, system4_MC_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Cagliari -0.5. Average expected value was 18.4%, with a combined stake of $286. The sharpest edge was on Cagliari -0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 59.0% probability versus the market's implied 42.6% — a 16.4 percentage point gap at odds of 2.35. **Result:** All 3 trades won, netting +$386.10. ### Wave 5 — Minute 46' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 46'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 18.7%, with a combined stake of $302. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 43.7% probability versus the market's implied 31.7% — a 11.9 percentage point gap at odds of 3.15. **Result:** All 4 trades lost, netting $-302.00. ### Wave 6 — Minute 58' (Score: 1-2) **Context:** Cagliari leading 1-2 at 58'. J. Rodriguez scored moments ago. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Over 4.25 and Over 3.5. Average expected value was 40.1%, with a combined stake of $400. The sharpest edge was on Over 3.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 70.0% probability versus the market's implied 40.0% — a 30.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.5. **Result:** All 4 trades lost, netting $-400.00.
- **Minute 35'** — Asian Handicap Cagliari -1: AI saw 83.1% vs market's 49.3% (33.8pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 35'** — Asian Handicap Cagliari -1: AI saw 82.8% vs market's 49.3% (33.5pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 58'** — Over/Under Over 3.5: AI saw 70.0% vs market's 40.0% (30.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 21'** — Asian Handicap Cagliari -1: AI saw 78.0% vs market's 49.3% (28.7pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 58'** — Over/Under Over 3.5: AI saw 70.0% vs market's 42.1% (27.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.
- **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 3 trades, 3W/0L, +$324.55 (ROI: +108.2%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 8 trades, 4W/4L, +$124.95 (ROI: +15.9%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 8 trades, 4W/4L, +$124.50 (ROI: +15.7%) - **S5.1_Pre**: 2 trades, 2W/0L, +$62.90 (ROI: +104.8%)
Possession was 48–52 in AC Milan's deficit. AC Milan had 16 shots (3 on target) versus Cagliari's 24 (10 on target). Expected goals: AC Milan 1.71 — Cagliari 2.6. Corners: 4-5.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.8% ROI. Top performer: oddsflow_core_v8.1 at +$324.55.
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 75.8% / 18.4% / 9.5% |
| Asian handicap | -1.5 | 50.5% |
| Over / Under | 2.75 | 51.3% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
The significant undervaluation of Cagliari's outright win in the 1x2 market.
The Serie A clash between AC Milan and Cagliari concluded with a stunning 1-2 victory for Cagliari, a result that starkly contrasts with the pre-match market sentiment. The 1x2 market heavily favored AC Milan, assigning them a substantial 75.76% implied win probability, while Cagliari's chances were priced at a mere 9.5%. This represented a significant market inefficiency, as Cagliari delivered an upset. In the Handicap market, AC Milan was offered at -1.5, with a 50.51% probability of covering. Cagliari's outright win meant they comfortably covered the +1.5 line. The Totals market, set at 2.75 goals, showed a balanced expectation with both Over and Under priced at 51.28%. The match ultimately saw 3 goals, pushing the outcome to the Over. The most pronounced error was the severe misjudgment of Cagliari's ability to secure an outright win.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.8% ROI on 21 trades. Top performer: Oddsflow Core Strategy at +$324.55.
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.