Full Time
Saudi Pro League · King Khalid Sports City, Tabuk · 2026-05-21

NEOMNEOM
1 - 1
Al-EttifaqAl-Ettifaq

+$284.75
Match Precision63%
Signal Hit Rate17/27
Model Lineup
🎯
HDP Sniper
+$194
★★★☆☆
6W-3L · 67%
Active Trader
+$113
★★★☆☆
6W-3L · 67%
🛡️
Oddsflow Core Strategy
$-0
★★☆☆☆
1W-1L · 50%
🔮
Oddsflow Beta
$-22
★★☆☆☆
4W-3L · 57%
🧠 Key Question

Why did AI enter 6 times at 10', 15', 35', 42', 47', 74' — and still finish +$285?

Trade Story

Match Overview

NEOM hosted Al-Ettifaq in the Pro League, finishing 1-1. Goals: M. Dembele (6'), A. Al Haji (81'). OddsFlow deployed 27 trades across 6 waves, achieving 63% precision with a net result of +$284.75 (ROI: +32.6%).

Pre-Match Odds

The Asian Handicap held at -0.5 but home odds shifted from 1.85 to 1.96; the home moneyline drifted out from 1.85 to 1.96.

Trade Wave Analysis

### Wave 1 — Minute 10' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Al-Ettifaq leading 0-1 at 10'. M. Dembele scored moments ago. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting NEOM +0.5. Average expected value was 9.5%, with a combined stake of $4. The sharpest edge was on NEOM +0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 58.8% probability versus the market's implied 51.9% — a 6.9 percentage point gap at odds of 1.925. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$3.70. ### Wave 2 — Minute 15' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Al-Ettifaq leading 0-1 at 15'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Al-Ettifaq +1. Average expected value was 7.7%, with a combined stake of $4. The sharpest edge was on Al-Ettifaq +1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 41.9% probability versus the market's implied 36.4% — a 5.5 percentage point gap at odds of 2.75. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-4.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 35' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Al-Ettifaq leading 0-1 at 35'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline and Asian Handicap and Over/Under markets, targeting Al-Ettifaq and NEOM +0.5 and Under 3.5. Average expected value was 23.7%, with a combined stake of $289. The sharpest edge was on Al-Ettifaq (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 72.7% probability versus the market's implied 48.5% — a 24.2 percentage point gap at odds of 2.06. **Result:** 4 of 10 trades won, netting $-261.68. ### Wave 4 — Minute 42' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Al-Ettifaq leading 0-1 at 42'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 2.5. Average expected value was 9.5%, with a combined stake of $8. The sharpest edge was on Under 2.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 47.0% probability versus the market's implied 40.0% — a 7.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.5. **Result:** All 2 trades won, netting +$12.00. ### Wave 5 — Minute 47' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Al-Ettifaq leading 0-1 at 47'. 1 model (system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Over/Under and Asian Handicap and Moneyline markets, targeting Under 2.5 and NEOM +0.5 and Under 3.5 and Al-Ettifaq. Average expected value was 35.5%, with a combined stake of $314. The sharpest edge was on Under 2.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 80.3% probability versus the market's implied 53.5% — a 26.8 percentage point gap at odds of 1.87. **Result:** 4 of 7 trades won, netting $-21.77. ### Wave 6 — Minute 74' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 74'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 50.9%, with a combined stake of $255. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 58.4% probability versus the market's implied 31.3% — a 27.2 percentage point gap at odds of 3.2. **Result:** All 6 trades won, netting +$556.50.

Key Mispricing Moments

- **Minute 74'** — Moneyline Draw: AI saw 58.4% vs market's 31.3% (27.2pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 47'** — Over/Under Under 2.5: AI saw 80.3% vs market's 53.5% (26.8pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 74'** — Moneyline Draw: AI saw 58.4% vs market's 31.7% (26.7pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 74'** — Moneyline Draw: AI saw 58.4% vs market's 31.7% (26.7pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 47'** — Over/Under Under 2.5: AI saw 80.3% vs market's 54.9% (25.3pp gap). correctly identified.

Model Performance

- **system4_MC_v10**: 9 trades, 6W/3L, +$193.76 (ROI: +60.5%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 9 trades, 6W/3L, +$113.06 (ROI: +48.7%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 2 trades, 1W/1L, $-0.30 (ROI: -3.7%) - **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 7 trades, 4W/3L, $-21.77 (ROI: -6.9%)

Match Statistics

Possession was 62–38 in NEOM's favor. NEOM had 14 shots (3 on target) versus Al-Ettifaq's 9 (5 on target). Expected goals: NEOM 1.6 — Al-Ettifaq 0.55. Corners: 4-0.

🏆

Verdict

A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.6% ROI. Top performer: system4_MC_v10 at +$193.76.

Trade Waves
Match Timeline
46'🔄
C
J. Costa(assist: M. Gluscevic)Al-Ettifaq
55'🔄
R
L. Rodriguez(assist: M. Al Saad)NEOM
63'🔄
D
M. Dembele(assist: Kouka)Al-Ettifaq
67'🔄
H
I. Hawsawi(assist: A. Al Anzi)NEOM
67'🔄
O
A. Al Oyayari(assist: F. Abdi)NEOM
70'🔄
O
M. Al Olayan(assist: A. Dahal)Al-Ettifaq
79'🔄
D
K. Al Dawsari(assist: Y. Gharwi)NEOM
79'🔄
M
R. Messi(assist: M. Al Burayk)NEOM
90'+3🔄
G
M. Gluscevic(assist: F. Al Ghamdi)Al-Ettifaq
90'+3🔄
G
K. Al Ghannam(assist: A. Maghfori)Al-Ettifaq
Odds Movement
Key Mispricing
Match Statistics
Pre-Match Odds
Verdict

A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.6% ROI on 27 trades. Top performer: HDP Sniper at +$193.76.

See AI signals as they happen

This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.