Sunderland1 - 0Tottenham
SunderlandWhy did AI enter 5 times at 25', 34', 39', 61', 65' — and still finish +$992?
Match Overview
Sunderland hosted Tottenham in the Premier League, finishing 1-0. Goals: N. Mukiele (61'). OddsFlow deployed 11 trades across 5 waves, achieving 45% precision with a net result of +$992.00 (ROI: +16.1%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap held at 0 but home odds shifted from 1.95 to 1.93.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 25' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 25'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline markets, targeting Tottenham 0 and Sunderland. Average expected value was 8.3%, with a combined stake of $1500. The sharpest edge was on Tottenham 0 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 61.3% probability versus the market's implied 53.3% — a 8.0 percentage point gap at odds of 1.875. **Result:** 1 of 3 trades won, netting +$0.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 34' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 34'. 1 model (system4_MC_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 5.7%, with a combined stake of $500. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-500.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 39' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 39'. 1 model (system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 4.8%, with a combined stake of $500. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-500.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 61' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Sunderland leading 1-0 at 61'. N. Mukiele scored moments ago. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Over 1.5. Average expected value was 26.4%, with a combined stake of $1000. The sharpest edge was on Over 1.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 70.0% probability versus the market's implied 42.1% — a 27.9 percentage point gap at odds of 2.375. **Result:** All 2 trades lost, netting $-1000.00. ### Wave 5 — Minute 65' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Sunderland leading 1-0 at 65'. N. Mukiele scored moments ago. Tottenham made 3 substitutions. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Tottenham -1 and Tottenham -0.5. Average expected value was 43.4%, with a combined stake of $2656. The sharpest edge was on Tottenham -0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 79.8% probability versus the market's implied 36.4% — a 43.4 percentage point gap at odds of 2.75. **Result:** All 4 trades won, netting +$2992.00.
Key Mispricing Moments
- **Minute 66'** — Asian Handicap Tottenham -0.5: AI saw 79.8% vs market's 36.4% (43.4pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 66'** — Asian Handicap Tottenham -0.5: AI saw 79.2% vs market's 36.4% (42.9pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 65'** — Asian Handicap Tottenham -1: AI saw 96.3% vs market's 57.1% (39.2pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 65'** — Asian Handicap Tottenham -1: AI saw 96.1% vs market's 57.1% (39.0pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 61'** — Over/Under Over 1.5: AI saw 70.0% vs market's 42.1% (27.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.
Model Performance
- **system4_MC_v10**: 6 trades, 3W/3L, +$997.50 (ROI: +30.0%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 5 trades, 2W/3L, $-5.50 (ROI: -0.2%)
Match Statistics
Possession was 53%–47% in Sunderland's favor. Sunderland had 13 shots (2 on target) versus Tottenham's 11 (7 on target). Expected goals: Sunderland 1.79 — Tottenham 0.91. Corners: 2-6.
Verdict
A positive result for OddsFlow with +16.1% ROI. The models found genuine edges though not all converted. Top performer: system4_MC_v10 at +$997.50.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 37.3% / 29.9% / 36.1% |
| Asian handicap | 0 | 51.8% |
| Over / Under | 2.5 | 51.5% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
Under 2.5 Value Bet
Sunderland secured a 1-0 victory against Tottenham. The 1x2 market saw Sunderland as a slight favorite with a 37.31% implied win probability, aligning with the actual outcome. On the Asian Handicap (0), Sunderland successfully covered the spread, outperforming the model's 51.81% cover probability. The most prominent **Market Inefficiency** occurred in the Totals market. Despite the closing line setting the Over/Under 2.5 at near even odds (51.55% Over, 51.55% Under), the match ended with only one goal. This represents a significant **EV+ signal** on the Under 2.5, as the market evidently underestimated the potential for a low-scoring affair.
A positive result with +16.1% ROI. The models found genuine edges, finishing at +$992.00. Top performer: HDP Sniper at +$997.50.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.