Full Time
Premier League · Stadium of Light, Sunderland · 2026-05-09

SunderlandSunderland
0 - 0
Manchester UnitedManchester United

+$5654.00
Match Precision91%
Signal Hit Rate10/15
Model Lineup
🎯
HDP Sniper
+$2067
★★★★★
3W-0L · 100%
Active Trader
+$1829
★★★★★
3W-0L · 100%
🔮
Oddsflow Beta
+$1567
★★★★
3W-1L · 75%
PreMatch Edge
+$192
★★★★★
1W-0L · 100%
🛡️
Oddsflow Core Strategy
+$0
☆☆☆☆
0W-0L · 0%
🧠 Key Question

Why did AI enter 5 times at 0', 18', 25', 29', 47' — and still finish +$5654?

Trade Story

Match Overview

Sunderland hosted Manchester United in the Premier League, finishing 0-0. OddsFlow deployed 15 trades across 5 waves, achieving 67% precision with a net result of +$5654.00 (ROI: +76.7%).

Pre-Match Odds

The Asian Handicap held at 0.5 but home odds shifted from 1.99 to 1.93.

Trade Wave Analysis

### Wave 1 — Minute 0' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 0'. 1 model (S5.1_Pre) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 2.75. Average expected value was 7.3%, with a combined stake of $200. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$192.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 18' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 18'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Manchester United 0. Average expected value was 21.6%, with a combined stake of $200. The sharpest edge was on Manchester United 0 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 73.6% probability versus the market's implied 54.1% — a 19.5 percentage point gap at odds of 1.85. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 25' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 25'. 3 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10, system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Over/Under and Moneyline markets, targeting Manchester United 0 and Under 2.5 and Manchester United and Draw. Average expected value was 12.5%, with a combined stake of $4967. The sharpest edge was on Manchester United 0 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 74.7% probability versus the market's implied 53.3% — a 21.4 percentage point gap at odds of 1.875. **Result:** 5 of 9 trades won, netting +$2399.50. ### Wave 4 — Minute 29' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 29'. 3 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10, system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 1.5. Average expected value was 8.4%, with a combined stake of $1500. The sharpest edge was on Under 1.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 46.7% probability versus the market's implied 40.0% — a 6.7 percentage point gap at odds of 2.5. **Result:** All 3 trades won, netting +$2250.00. ### Wave 5 — Minute 47' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 47'. 1 model (system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 4.6%, with a combined stake of $500. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$812.50.

Key Mispricing Moments

- **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Manchester United 0: AI saw 74.7% vs market's 53.3% (21.4pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Manchester United 0: AI saw 74.3% vs market's 53.3% (20.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Manchester United 0: AI saw 73.8% vs market's 53.3% (20.5pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 18'** — Asian Handicap Manchester United 0: AI saw 73.6% vs market's 54.1% (19.5pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.

Model Performance

- **system4_MC_v10**: 4 trades, 3W/0L/1V, +$2066.50 (ROI: +96.4%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 4 trades, 3W/0L/1V, +$1829.00 (ROI: +84.8%) - **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 5 trades, 3W/1L/1V, +$1566.50 (ROI: +58.7%) - **S5.1_Pre**: 1 trades, 1W/0L, +$192.00 (ROI: +96.0%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 1 trades, 0W/0L/1V, +$0.00 (ROI: +0.0%)

Match Statistics

Possession was 51–49 in Sunderland's favor. Sunderland had 15 shots (4 on target) versus Manchester United's 9 (0 on target). Expected goals: Sunderland 1.16 — Manchester United 0.39. Corners: 6-5.

🏆

Verdict

A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +76.7% ROI. Top performer: system4_MC_v10 at +$2066.50.

Market Efficiency

What the closing market expected

The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.

MarketLineImplied probability
1X2 (home / draw / away)Favourite: Away25.6% / 26.9% / 50.3%
Asian handicap+0.551.8%
Over / Under2.7551.5%

Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.

Where the market was wrong

Under 2.75 Value Bet

The Premier League fixture between Sunderland and Manchester United concluded in a 0-0 draw, contrary to the 1x2 market's expectation that heavily favored a Manchester United victory (50.25% probability). The Asian Handicap market, set at -0.5 for Manchester United, saw Sunderland (+0.5) comfortably cover, aligning with the actual draw. However, the most pronounced market inefficiency was observed in the Totals market. Despite the closing line suggesting a slight lean towards Over 2.75 goals (51.55% probability), the match ended goalless. This drastic miss indicates a significant mispricing by bookmakers, presenting a clear EV+ opportunity for those who backed the Under.

Trade Waves
Match Timeline
65'🔄
Z
J. Zirkzee(assist: P. Dorgu)Manchester United
75'🔄
D
A. Diallo(assist: B. Mbeumo)Manchester United
76'🔄
D
A. Diallo(assist: B. Mbeumo)Manchester United
79'🔄
T
C. Talbi(assist: N. Angulo)Sunderland
90'🔄
H
T. Hume(assist: E. Mayenda)Sunderland
Odds Movement
Key Mispricing
Match Statistics
Pre-Match Odds
Verdict

A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +76.7% ROI on 15 trades. Top performer: HDP Sniper at +$2066.50.

See AI signals as they happen

This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.