Chelsea2 - 1Tottenham
ChelseaWhy did AI enter 5 times at 0', 10', 18', 35', 67' — and still finish +$612?
Match Overview
Chelsea hosted Tottenham in the Premier League, finishing 2-1. Goals: E. Fernandez (18'), Andrey Santos (67'), Richarlison (74'). OddsFlow deployed 11 trades across 5 waves, achieving 82% precision with a net result of +$611.55 (ROI: +61.2%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap line moved from -0.5 to -0.25; the Over/Under line shifted from 3 to 2.75.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 0' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 0'. 1 model (S5.1_Pre) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Over 2.75. Average expected value was 18.7%, with a combined stake of $10. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$5.25. ### Wave 2 — Minute 10' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 10'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Tottenham 0. Average expected value was 16.5%, with a combined stake of $100. The sharpest edge was on Tottenham 0 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 57.5% probability versus the market's implied 43.5% — a 14.1 percentage point gap at odds of 2.3. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-100.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 18' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 18'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Tottenham -1. Average expected value was 31.6%, with a combined stake of $100. The sharpest edge was on Tottenham -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 79.7% probability versus the market's implied 50.0% — a 29.7 percentage point gap at odds of 2. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 35' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Chelsea leading 1-0 at 35'. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Tottenham -1. Average expected value was 43.2%, with a combined stake of $316. The sharpest edge was on Tottenham -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 90.6% probability versus the market's implied 49.4% — a 41.3 percentage point gap at odds of 2.025. **Result:** All 2 trades won, netting +$323.90. ### Wave 5 — Minute 67' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Chelsea leading 1-0 at 67'. Andrey Santos scored moments ago. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Over 1.75 and Over 1.5. Average expected value was 28.1%, with a combined stake of $474. The sharpest edge was on Over 1.75 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 70.0% probability versus the market's implied 51.0% — a 19.0 percentage point gap at odds of 1.96. **Result:** All 6 trades won, netting +$382.40.
Key Mispricing Moments
- **Minute 35'** — Asian Handicap Tottenham -1: AI saw 90.6% vs market's 49.4% (41.3pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 35'** — Asian Handicap Tottenham -1: AI saw 90.5% vs market's 49.4% (41.1pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 18'** — Asian Handicap Tottenham -1: AI saw 79.7% vs market's 50.0% (29.7pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 67'** — Over/Under Over 1.75: AI saw 70.0% vs market's 51.0% (19.0pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 67'** — Over/Under Over 1.75: AI saw 70.0% vs market's 51.0% (19.0pp gap). correctly identified.
Model Performance
- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 4 trades, 4W/0L, +$353.15 (ROI: +89.4%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 4 trades, 4W/0L, +$353.15 (ROI: +89.4%) - **S5.1_Pre**: 1 trades, 0W/0L/1V, +$5.25 (ROI: +52.5%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 2 trades, 0W/1L/1V, $-100.00 (ROI: -50.0%)
Match Statistics
Possession was 45–55 in Chelsea's deficit. Chelsea had 9 shots (4 on target) versus Tottenham's 9 (3 on target). Expected goals: Chelsea 0.63 — Tottenham 1.72. Corners: 3-4.
Verdict
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +61.2% ROI. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at +$353.15.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 46.5% / 27.9% / 28.4% |
| Asian handicap | -0.25 | 53.5% |
| Over / Under | 2.75 | 48.8% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
The Totals market (O/U 2.75) underestimated the likelihood of Over goals.
In the Premier League clash, Chelsea defeated Tottenham 2-1, resulting in a total of 3 goals. The 1x2 market correctly identified Chelsea as the market favorite (46.51% win probability), aligning with the actual outcome. Similarly, Chelsea successfully covered the Asian Handicap of -0.25, a scenario the market had anticipated with a 53.48% probability. However, the Totals market (O/U 2.75) presented a clear market inefficiency. Despite the closing odds implying a 53.76% chance for Under 2.75 goals, the match produced 3 goals, hitting the Over. This indicates a strong EV+ value signal for the Over bet, as bookmakers significantly underestimated the goal-scoring potential. Bettors following the OddsFlow model would have found substantial Closing Line Value on the Over 2.75.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +61.2% ROI on 11 trades. Top performer: Active Trader at +$353.15.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.