Burnley3 - 4Brentford
BurnleyWhy did AI enter 2 times at 20', 48' — and still finish +$300?
Match Overview
Burnley hosted Brentford in the Premier League, finishing 3-4. Goals: M. Damsgaard (9'), I. Thiago (25'), K. Schade (34'), M. Kayode (45' OG), J. Anthony (47'), Z. Flemming (60'), Z. Flemming (78'), Z. Flemming (79'), M. Damsgaard (90'), A. Barnes (90'). OddsFlow deployed 2 trades across 2 waves, achieving 50% precision with a net result of +$300.00 (ROI: +42.9%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap line moved from 0.5 to 0.75; the home moneyline drifted out from 4.22 to 4.63.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 20' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Brentford leading 0-1 at 20'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Brentford +1.25. Average expected value was 15.8%, with a combined stake of $200. The sharpest edge was on Brentford +1.25 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 72.1% probability versus the market's implied 56.3% — a 15.8 percentage point gap at odds of 1.775. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-200.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 48' (Score: 1-3) **Context:** Brentford leading 1-3 at 48'. J. Anthony scored moments ago. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Over 4.5. Average expected value was 25.8%, with a combined stake of $500. The sharpest edge was on Over 4.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 60.0% probability versus the market's implied 50.0% — a 10.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$500.00.
Key Mispricing Moments
- **Minute 20'** — Asian Handicap Brentford +1.25: AI saw 72.1% vs market's 56.3% (15.8pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.
Model Performance
- **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 2 trades, 1W/1L, +$300.00 (ROI: +42.9%)
Match Statistics
Possession was 42%–58% in Burnley's deficit. Burnley had 13 shots (4 on target) versus Brentford's 16 (7 on target). Expected goals: Burnley 1.5 — Brentford 1.94. Corners: 4-8.
Verdict
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +42.9% ROI.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Away | 21.6% / 26.0% / 55.9% |
| Asian handicap | +0.75 | 49.0% |
| Over / Under | 2.5 | 54.0% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
The market undervalued Brentford covering the -0.75 Asian Handicap.
The Premier League fixture between Burnley and Brentford concluded with a high-scoring 3-4 victory for Brentford. The 1x2 market accurately priced Brentford as the favorites, with an implied probability of 55.87% for an away win, which materialized. The Totals market also showed efficiency, correctly leaning towards the Over 2.5 goals with a 54.05% implied probability, as the match produced a total of 7 goals. However, a significant market inefficiency was evident in the Asian Handicap market. Brentford, the favorites, were offered at a -0.75 handicap. Despite winning 4-3 and thus covering the -0.75 line, the closing odds implied a higher probability (53.19%) for Burnley to cover the +0.75. This indicates the market undervalued Brentford's ability to win by at least a single goal margin, presenting a clear **EV+ opportunity** for those who backed Brentford -0.75 AH.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +42.9% ROI on 2 trades.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.