Brighton3 - 0Wolves
Brighton1 trades, 0% precision — how did AI read this match?
Match Overview
Brighton hosted Wolves in the Premier League, finishing 3-0. Goals: J. Hinshelwood (1'), L. Dunk (5'), Y. Minteh (86'). OddsFlow deployed 1 trades across 1 wave, achieving 0% precision with a net result of +$0.00 (ROI: +0.0%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap line moved from -1.5 to -1.75.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 0' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 0'. 1 model (S5.1_Pre) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 3. Average expected value was 28.3%, with a combined stake of $661. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00.
Model Performance
- **S5.1_Pre**: 1 trades, 0W/0L/1V, +$0.00 (ROI: +0.0%)
Match Statistics
Possession was 73–27 in Brighton's favor. Brighton had 13 shots (6 on target) versus Wolves's 4 (1 on target). Expected goals: Brighton 1.46 — Wolves 0.42. Corners: 7-1.
Verdict
A marginally negative session at 0.0% ROI. The edge identification was sound but variance went against the positions.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 78.1% / 15.9% / 9.8% |
| Asian handicap | -1.75 | 48.8% |
| Over / Under | 3 | 54.6% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
Underestimation of Brighton's Asian Handicap covering ability.
The match between Brighton and Wolves concluded with a dominant 3-0 victory for Brighton. In the 1x2 market, the result aligned with the market's high expectation for a Brighton win (78.13% implied probability). However, the Asian Handicap market presented a clear inefficiency. Brighton, priced at -1.75, comfortably covered the spread with their three-goal margin, despite the market assigning only a 48.78% probability to them doing so. This indicates significant Closing Line Value (CLV) on Brighton -1.75. For the Goals Over/Under market, with a line of 3, the total of 3 goals resulted in a push for both over and under bets, despite the market leaning slightly towards 'Over' (54.64% probability). The primary market misjudgment was the underestimation of Brighton's ability to cover the handicap.
A marginally negative session at 0.0% ROI. The edge identification was sound but variance went against the positions.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.