Brentford2 - 2Everton
BrentfordWhy did AI enter 2 times at 25', 59' — and still finish +$7753?
Match Overview
Brentford hosted Everton in the Premier League, finishing 2-2. Goals: I. Thiago (3' pen), Beto (26'), I. Thiago (76'), I. Thiago (77'), K. Dewsbury-Hall (90'). OddsFlow deployed 17 trades across 2 waves, achieving 65% precision with a net result of +$7752.85 (ROI: +82.2%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap held at -0.25 but home odds shifted from 1.9 to 1.95; the Over/Under stayed at 2.5 with Over odds moving from 1.98 to 2.09.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 25' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Brentford leading 1-0 at 25'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline and Over/Under markets, targeting Everton -1 and Brentford and Over 2.5 and Draw and Over 3.5 and Everton 0. Average expected value was 19.8%, with a combined stake of $7034. The sharpest edge was on Everton -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 86.6% probability versus the market's implied 47.6% — a 39.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.1. **Result:** 8 of 12 trades won, netting +$6160.65. ### Wave 2 — Minute 59' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 59'. 2 models (system4_HYBRID_v10, oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline and Over/Under markets, targeting Everton 0 and Draw and Brentford -0.25 and Everton -1 and Over 2.5. Average expected value was 20.8%, with a combined stake of $2396. The sharpest edge was on Everton -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 93.3% probability versus the market's implied 48.8% — a 44.5 percentage point gap at odds of 2.05. **Result:** 3 of 5 trades won, netting +$1592.20.
Key Mispricing Moments
- **Minute 61'** — Asian Handicap Everton -1: AI saw 93.3% vs market's 48.8% (44.5pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Everton -1: AI saw 86.6% vs market's 47.6% (39.0pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Everton -1: AI saw 86.2% vs market's 48.8% (37.4pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 59'** — Asian Handicap Everton 0: AI saw 69.4% vs market's 40.0% (29.4pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 26'** — Moneyline Brentford: AI saw 71.5% vs market's 47.6% (23.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.
Model Performance
- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 6 trades, 4W/1L/1V, +$3181.20 (ROI: +92.8%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 6 trades, 4W/1L/1V, +$2979.45 (ROI: +82.6%) - **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 4 trades, 3W/0L/1V, +$1692.20 (ROI: +77.1%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 1 trades, 0W/0L/1V, $-100.00 (ROI: -50.0%)
Match Statistics
Possession was 54%–46% in Brentford's favor. Brentford had 16 shots (4 on target) versus Everton's 14 (6 on target). Expected goals: Brentford 1.88 — Everton 1.28. Corners: 2-3.
Verdict
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +82.2% ROI. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at +$3181.20.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 44.0% / 29.5% / 29.1% |
| Asian handicap | -0.25 | 51.3% |
| Over / Under | 2.5 | 47.9% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
Significant Underestimation of Over 2.5 Goals
The match between Brentford and Everton concluded in a 2-2 draw, resulting in 4 total goals. The 1x2 market initially priced Brentford as the favorite with a 44.05% implied probability of winning, significantly underestimating the likelihood of a draw (29.5% implied probability). The eventual 2-2 scoreline demonstrated a clear market inefficiency in the draw odds. On the Asian Handicap (-0.25 for Brentford), the market slightly favored Brentford to cover. Given the draw, this bet would have resulted in a half-loss for Brentford backers, indicating a marginal overestimation of Brentford's strength. However, the most pronounced error was in the Goals Over/Under market. The closing line of 2.5 goals saw the market leaning heavily towards the Under (54.64% implied probability). With 4 goals scored, the Over 2.5 proved to be the correct outcome, representing significant Closing Line Value (CLV) and a strong Value Signal that bookmakers misjudged the game's offensive potential.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +82.2% ROI on 17 trades. Top performer: Active Trader at +$3181.20.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.