Real Madrid1 - 1Girona
Real MadridWhy did AI enter 8 times at 25', 31', 36', 45', 52', 62', 73', 93' — and still finish +$6150?
Match Overview
Real Madrid hosted Girona in the La Liga, finishing 1-1. Goals: F. Valverde (51'), T. Lemar (62'). OddsFlow deployed 18 trades across 8 waves, achieving 61% precision with a net result of +$6150.20 (ROI: +64.3%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap line moved from -2 to -1.5; the Over/Under line shifted from 3.5 to 3.25; the home moneyline drifted out from 1.22 to 1.33.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 25' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 25'. 3 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10, system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Girona -1. Average expected value was 21.2%, with a combined stake of $1500. The sharpest edge was on Girona -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 61.9% probability versus the market's implied 42.6% — a 19.3 percentage point gap at odds of 2.35. **Result:** All 3 trades won, netting +$1975.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 31' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 31'. 1 model (system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 4.0%, with a combined stake of $500. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 27.8% probability versus the market's implied 21.1% — a 6.7 percentage point gap at odds of 4.75. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$1875.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 36' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 36'. 1 model (system4_MC_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 5.3%, with a combined stake of $500. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 30.0% probability versus the market's implied 22.2% — a 7.7 percentage point gap at odds of 4.5. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$1750.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 45' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 45'. 1 model (system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Real Madrid and Draw. Average expected value was 5.6%, with a combined stake of $1000. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 28.4% probability versus the market's implied 21.1% — a 7.3 percentage point gap at odds of 4.75. **Result:** 1 of 2 trades won, netting +$1375.00. ### Wave 5 — Minute 52' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** Real Madrid leading 1-0 at 52'. F. Valverde scored moments ago. 3 models (system4_HYBRID_v10, system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline and Asian Handicap markets, targeting Real Madrid and Girona -1.5. Average expected value was 32.9%, with a combined stake of $2366. The sharpest edge was on Girona -1.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 85.2% probability versus the market's implied 51.3% — a 33.9 percentage point gap at odds of 1.95. **Result:** 1 of 3 trades won, netting $-1262.30. ### Wave 6 — Minute 62' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1 after T. Lemar's equalizer at 62'. 3 models (system4_HYBRID_v10, system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Over/Under and Asian Handicap markets, targeting Over 2.5 and Girona -0.5. Average expected value was 19.3%, with a combined stake of $2000. The sharpest edge was on Over 2.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 70.0% probability versus the market's implied 40.0% — a 30.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.5. **Result:** 1 of 4 trades won, netting $-962.50. ### Wave 7 — Minute 73' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1 after T. Lemar's equalizer at 62'. 3 models (oddsflow_core_v8.1, system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Real Madrid -0.75 and Girona -0.5. Average expected value was 18.9%, with a combined stake of $1200. The sharpest edge was on Girona -0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 74.9% probability versus the market's implied 48.8% — a 26.1 percentage point gap at odds of 2.05. **Result:** 2 of 3 trades won, netting +$850.00. ### Wave 8 — Minute 93' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 93'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 3.5. Average expected value was 21.1%, with a combined stake of $500. The sharpest edge was on Under 3.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 63.0% probability versus the market's implied 47.6% — a 15.4 percentage point gap at odds of 2.1. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$550.00.
Key Mispricing Moments
- **Minute 55'** — Asian Handicap Girona -1.5: AI saw 85.2% vs market's 51.3% (33.9pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 62'** — Over/Under Over 2.5: AI saw 70.0% vs market's 40.0% (30.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 74'** — Asian Handicap Girona -0.5: AI saw 74.9% vs market's 48.8% (26.1pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 75'** — Asian Handicap Girona -0.5: AI saw 74.3% vs market's 48.8% (25.5pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 52'** — Moneyline Real Madrid: AI saw 87.3% vs market's 66.7% (20.6pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.
Model Performance
- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 6 trades, 4W/2L, +$2612.70 (ROI: +85.2%) - **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 5 trades, 3W/2L, +$1637.50 (ROI: +56.5%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 5 trades, 3W/2L, +$1550.00 (ROI: +53.4%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 2 trades, 1W/1L, +$350.00 (ROI: +50.0%)
Match Statistics
Possession was 60%–40% in Real Madrid's favor. Real Madrid had 22 shots (9 on target) versus Girona's 10 (2 on target). Expected goals: Real Madrid 2.22 — Girona 0.52. Corners: 10-1.
Verdict
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +64.3% ROI. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at +$2612.70.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 75.2% / 16.3% / 12.3% |
| Asian handicap | -1.5 | 51.5% |
| Over / Under | 3.25 | 51.3% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
Underestimation of Draw Probability
The La Liga fixture between Real Madrid and Girona concluded in a 1-1 draw, a result that diverged significantly from the market's closing expectations. The 1X2 market had Real Madrid as overwhelming favorites with a 75.19% implied win probability, while the draw was priced at a mere 16.31%. This stark contrast highlights a major market inefficiency, as the draw outcome represented substantial EV+. On the Asian Handicap market, Real Madrid (-1.5) was expected to cover with 51.55% probability, yet Girona comfortably covered the spread. The total goals line closed at 3.25 with even probabilities for Over/Under; the actual 2 goals meant the Under 3.25 was the correct market side. Overall, the market's underestimation of Girona's resilience and the probability of a stalemate was the most pronounced error.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +64.3% ROI on 18 trades. Top performer: Active Trader at +$2612.70.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.