Full Time
Indian Super League · Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi · 2026-05-06

Minerva PunjabMinerva Punjab
1 - 0
ChennaiyinChennaiyin

$-1710.00
Match Precision36%
Signal Hit Rate5/17
Model Lineup
🛡️
Oddsflow Core Strategy
$-200
☆☆☆☆
0W-1L · 0%
🔮
Oddsflow Beta
$-375
☆☆☆☆
1W-2L · 33%
🎯
HDP Sniper
$-568
☆☆☆☆
2W-3L · 40%
Active Trader
$-568
☆☆☆☆
2W-3L · 40%
🧠 Key Question

Why did AI enter 6 times at 15', 25', 33', 49', 56', 83' — and still finish $-1710?

Trade Story

Match Overview

Minerva Punjab hosted Chennaiyin in the Indian Super League, finishing 1-0. Goals: L. Hnamte (84' OG). OddsFlow deployed 17 trades across 6 waves, achieving 29% precision with a net result of $-1710.00 (ROI: -20.3%).

Pre-Match Odds

The Asian Handicap held at -1 but home odds shifted from 1.85 to 2.01.

Trade Wave Analysis

### Wave 1 — Minute 15' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 15'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Chennaiyin -1. Average expected value was 21.1%, with a combined stake of $200. The sharpest edge was on Chennaiyin -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 74.4% probability versus the market's implied 56.3% — a 18.1 percentage point gap at odds of 1.775. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 25' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 25'. 3 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10, system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Over/Under and Moneyline markets, targeting Chennaiyin -1 and Under 2.5 and Chennaiyin -0.5 and Draw. Average expected value was 12.8%, with a combined stake of $4527. The sharpest edge was on Chennaiyin -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 77.0% probability versus the market's implied 57.1% — a 19.9 percentage point gap at odds of 1.75. **Result:** 2 of 8 trades won, netting $-1385.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 33' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 33'. 3 models (system4_HYBRID_v10, system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Over/Under and Moneyline markets, targeting Under 1.5 and Draw. Average expected value was 7.2%, with a combined stake of $2000. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 35.1% probability versus the market's implied 29.4% — a 5.7 percentage point gap at odds of 3.4. **Result:** 3 of 4 trades won, netting +$1375.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 49' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 49'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Chennaiyin -0.5. Average expected value was 11.3%, with a combined stake of $200. The sharpest edge was on Chennaiyin -0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 59.4% probability versus the market's implied 50.6% — a 8.7 percentage point gap at odds of 1.975. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-200.00. ### Wave 5 — Minute 56' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 56'. 1 model (system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 4.5%, with a combined stake of $500. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-500.00. ### Wave 6 — Minute 83' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 83'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Chennaiyin 0. Average expected value was 46.2%, with a combined stake of $1000. The sharpest edge was on Chennaiyin 0 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 80.8% probability versus the market's implied 36.4% — a 44.5 percentage point gap at odds of 2.75. **Result:** All 2 trades lost, netting $-1000.00.

Key Mispricing Moments

- **Minute 83'** — Asian Handicap Chennaiyin 0: AI saw 80.8% vs market's 36.4% (44.5pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 83'** — Asian Handicap Chennaiyin 0: AI saw 79.8% vs market's 36.4% (43.5pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Chennaiyin -1: AI saw 77.0% vs market's 57.1% (19.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 25'** — Asian Handicap Chennaiyin -1: AI saw 76.7% vs market's 57.1% (19.5pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 15'** — Asian Handicap Chennaiyin -1: AI saw 74.4% vs market's 56.3% (18.1pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.

Model Performance

- **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 2 trades, 0W/1L/1V, $-200.00 (ROI: -50.0%) - **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 3 trades, 1W/2L, $-375.00 (ROI: -25.0%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 6 trades, 2W/3L/1V, $-567.50 (ROI: -17.4%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 6 trades, 2W/3L/1V, $-567.50 (ROI: -17.4%)

Match Statistics

Possession was 60–40 in Minerva Punjab's favor. Minerva Punjab had 16 shots (3 on target) versus Chennaiyin's 10 (1 on target). Corners: 7-4.

🏆

Verdict

A tough session at -20.3% ROI. The market moved against OddsFlow's positions, though the underlying probability assessments may still prove correct over a larger sample. Top performer: oddsflow_core_v8.1 at $-200.00.

Trade Waves
Match Timeline
65'🔄
O
B. Osuji(assist: S. Zeljkovic)Minerva Punjab
65'🔄
R
V. Rai(assist: S. B. Singh)Minerva Punjab
72'🔄
C
F. Choudhary(assist: K. Pereira)Chennaiyin
72'🔄
L
P. Laldinpuia(assist: Eduardo Kau)Chennaiyin
86'🔄
H
L. Hnamte(assist: M. T. Singh)Chennaiyin
86'🔄
S
P. Santos(assist: P. Ranbir)Minerva Punjab
88'🔄
R
L. Renthlei(assist: A. Mukherjee)Chennaiyin
88'🔄
D
M. Desai(assist: S. Prakadeswaran)Chennaiyin
90'🔄
R
Dani Ramirez(assist: S. Shami)Minerva Punjab
90'🔄
K
M. Kipgen(assist: L. Augustine)Minerva Punjab
Odds Movement
Key Mispricing
Match Statistics
Pre-Match Odds
Verdict

A tough session at -20.3% ROI. The market moved against OddsFlow's positions. Top performer: Oddsflow Core Strategy at $-200.00.

See AI signals as they happen

This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.