Full Time
Eredivisie · Asito Stadium, Almelo · 2026-05-17

HeraclesHeracles
1 - 2
GroningenGroningen

+$412.46
Match Precision81%
Signal Hit Rate17/23
Model Lineup
Active Trader
+$172
★★★★★
6W-1L · 86%
🎯
HDP Sniper
+$130
★★★☆☆
6W-3L · 67%
🛡️
Oddsflow Core Strategy
+$110
★★★★★
5W-0L · 100%
PreMatch Edge
+$0
☆☆☆☆
0W-0L · 0%
🧠 Key Question

Why did AI enter 6 times at 0', 10', 19', 34', 54', 58' — and still finish +$412?

Trade Story

Match Overview

Heracles hosted Groningen in the Eredivisie, finishing 1-2. Goals: D. van der Werff (3'), T. van Gilst (17'), T. Land (56'). OddsFlow deployed 23 trades across 6 waves, achieving 74% precision with a net result of +$412.46 (ROI: +69.0%).

Pre-Match Odds

The Asian Handicap remained steady at 1; the Over/Under line shifted from 3.5 to 3.25; the home moneyline drifted out from 4.64 to 4.84.

Trade Wave Analysis

### Wave 1 — Minute 0' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 0'. 1 model (S5.1_Pre) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Groningen +1. Average expected value was 21.4%, with a combined stake of $10. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 10' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Groningen leading 0-1 at 10'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Heracles +1.5. Average expected value was 14.5%, with a combined stake of $4. The sharpest edge was on Heracles +1.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 63.2% probability versus the market's implied 51.3% — a 11.9 percentage point gap at odds of 1.95. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$3.80. ### Wave 3 — Minute 19' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1 after T. van Gilst's equalizer at 17'. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Groningen +1. Average expected value was 27.7%, with a combined stake of $4. The sharpest edge was on Groningen +1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 69.6% probability versus the market's implied 44.4% — a 25.2 percentage point gap at odds of 2.25. **Result:** 0 of 1 trades won, netting +$0.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 34' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 34'. 3 models (oddsflow_core_v8.1, system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline markets, targeting Groningen +0.5 and Groningen. Average expected value was 17.7%, with a combined stake of $503. The sharpest edge was on Groningen +0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 63.3% probability versus the market's implied 51.0% — a 12.3 percentage point gap at odds of 1.96. **Result:** All 15 trades won, netting +$476.16. ### Wave 5 — Minute 54' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 54'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 8.3%, with a combined stake of $73. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 33.8% probability versus the market's implied 21.7% — a 12.0 percentage point gap at odds of 4.6. **Result:** All 4 trades lost, netting $-73.00. ### Wave 6 — Minute 58' (Score: 1-2) **Context:** Groningen leading 1-2 at 58'. T. Land scored moments ago. 1 model (oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Heracles +1. Average expected value was 22.6%, with a combined stake of $4. The sharpest edge was on Heracles +1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 62.1% probability versus the market's implied 42.1% — a 20.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.375. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$5.50.

Key Mispricing Moments

- **Minute 19'** — Asian Handicap Groningen +1: AI saw 69.6% vs market's 44.4% (25.2pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 58'** — Asian Handicap Heracles +1: AI saw 62.1% vs market's 42.1% (20.0pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 35'** — Asian Handicap Groningen +0.5: AI saw 63.3% vs market's 51.0% (12.3pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 35'** — Asian Handicap Groningen +0.5: AI saw 63.3% vs market's 51.0% (12.3pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 55'** — Moneyline Draw: AI saw 33.8% vs market's 21.7% (12.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.

Model Performance

- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 7 trades, 6W/1L, +$172.10 (ROI: +90.6%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 9 trades, 6W/3L, +$129.94 (ROI: +46.6%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 6 trades, 5W/0L/1V, +$110.42 (ROI: +92.8%) - **S5.1_Pre**: 1 trades, 0W/0L/1V, +$0.00 (ROI: +0.0%)

Match Statistics

Possession was 52–48 in Heracles's favor. Heracles had 11 shots (2 on target) versus Groningen's 15 (5 on target). Expected goals: Heracles 0.64 — Groningen 1.18. Corners: 9-5.

🏆

Verdict

A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +69.0% ROI. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at +$172.10.

Trade Waves
Match Timeline
61'🔄
W
D. van der Werff(assist: T. Hernes)Groningen
74'🔄
L
T. Land(assist: R. Mendes)Groningen
76'🔄
E
M. Engels(assist: E. Ahlstrand)Heracles
76'🔄
B
T. Bruns(assist: R. Bozinovski)Heracles
76'🔄
C
W. Ould Chikh(assist: T. Hamamioglu)Heracles
85'🔄
B
M. Benita(assist: J. Wijnreder)Heracles
88'🔄
Z
J. Zamburek(assist: S. Blokhuis)Heracles
89'🔄
B
T. van Bergen(assist: J. Dillema)Groningen
89'🔄
T
Y. Taha(assist: W. Prins)Groningen
Odds Movement
Key Mispricing
Match Statistics
Pre-Match Odds
Verdict

A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +69.0% ROI on 23 trades. Top performer: Active Trader at +$172.10.

See AI signals as they happen

This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.