Eintracht Frankfurt1 - 2Hamburger SV
Eintracht FrankfurtWhy did AI enter 2 times at 47', 68' — and still finish +$2224?
Match Overview
Eintracht Frankfurt hosted Hamburger SV in the Bundesliga, finishing 1-2. Goals: C. Y. Uzun (48'), A. Gronbaek (51'), F. Vieira (59'). Eintracht Frankfurt received a red card (R. Kristensen, 90'). OddsFlow deployed 14 trades across 2 waves, achieving 64% precision with a net result of +$2223.88 (ROI: +32.7%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap held at -0.75 but home odds shifted from 1.86 to 1.97; the Over/Under line shifted from 3 to 3.25.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 47' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 47'. 3 models (oddsflow_core_v8.1, system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline and Over/Under markets, targeting Hamburger SV -0.5 and Draw and Under 1.5 and Hamburger SV 0. Average expected value was 14.9%, with a combined stake of $3700. The sharpest edge was on Hamburger SV 0 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 65.0% probability versus the market's implied 36.4% — a 28.6 percentage point gap at odds of 2.75. **Result:** 5 of 8 trades won, netting +$1150.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 68' (Score: 1-2) **Context:** Hamburger SV leading 1-2 at 68'. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Over/Under and Asian Handicap and Moneyline markets, targeting Over 3.5 and Eintracht Frankfurt +0.5 and Hamburger SV. Average expected value was 30.3%, with a combined stake of $3093. The sharpest edge was on Eintracht Frankfurt +0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 83.0% probability versus the market's implied 42.1% — a 40.9 percentage point gap at odds of 2.375. **Result:** 4 of 6 trades won, netting +$1073.88.
Key Mispricing Moments
- **Minute 70'** — Asian Handicap Eintracht Frankfurt +0.5: AI saw 83.0% vs market's 42.1% (40.9pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 70'** — Asian Handicap Eintracht Frankfurt +0.5: AI saw 82.3% vs market's 42.1% (40.2pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 68'** — Over/Under Over 3.5: AI saw 70.0% vs market's 40.0% (30.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 68'** — Over/Under Over 3.5: AI saw 70.0% vs market's 40.0% (30.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 47'** — Asian Handicap Hamburger SV 0: AI saw 65.0% vs market's 36.4% (28.6pp gap). correctly identified.
Model Performance
- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 6 trades, 4W/2L, +$1350.88 (ROI: +43.7%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 7 trades, 4W/3L, +$723.00 (ROI: +20.7%) - **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 1 trades, 1W/0L, +$150.00 (ROI: +75.0%)
Match Statistics
Possession was 64%–41% in Eintracht Frankfurt's favor. Eintracht Frankfurt had 7 shots (5 on target) versus Hamburger SV's 5 (1 on target). Expected goals: Eintracht Frankfurt 0.67 — Hamburger SV 0.21. Corners: 9-2.
Verdict
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.7% ROI. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at +$1350.88.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 56.8% / 23.6% / 22.8% |
| Asian handicap | -0.75 | 50.8% |
| Over / Under | 3.25 | 48.8% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
Significant 1x2 mispricing on Hamburger SV.
The Bundesliga clash between Eintracht Frankfurt and Hamburger SV concluded with an unexpected 1-2 victory for the visitors, Hamburger SV. The 1x2 market displayed significant inefficiency, heavily favoring Eintracht Frankfurt with a 56.82% implied probability for a home win, while the actual outcome was an away victory. This represents a substantial Closing Line Value (CLV) opportunity on the away side, as the market severely underestimated Hamburger SV's chances. On the Asian Handicap, Frankfurt was set at -0.75 (50.76% to cover), yet Hamburger SV comfortably covered their +0.75 line. This further reinforces the mispricing of the underdog. The Totals market, set at 3.25 goals, saw a slight lean towards the Under (53.76% implied probability). With 3 goals scored, the 'Under' hit, indicating this market was relatively more efficient, aligning with the actual outcome. The most glaring error was the fundamental misjudgment of the outright winner.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +32.7% ROI on 14 trades. Top performer: Active Trader at +$1350.88.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.