Bayer Leverkusen1 - 1Hamburger SV
Bayer LeverkusenWhy did AI enter 6 times at 0', 40', 48', 53', 58', 71' — and still finish +$2439?
Match Overview
Bayer Leverkusen hosted Hamburger SV in the Bundesliga, finishing 1-1. Goals: F. Vieira (61'), N. Remberg (78' OG). OddsFlow deployed 52 trades across 6 waves, achieving 75% precision with a net result of +$2439.22 (ROI: +69.2%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap held at -1.75 but home odds shifted from 2 to 1.9; the Over/Under line shifted from 3.5 to 3.75.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 0' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 0'. 1 model (S5.1_Pre) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 3.75. Average expected value was 29.6%, with a combined stake of $10. The sharpest edge was on Under 3.75 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 59.4% probability versus the market's implied 49.3% — a 10.1 percentage point gap at odds of 2.03. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$10.30. ### Wave 2 — Minute 40' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 40'. 3 models (system4_BLEND_v10, oddsflow_core_v8.1, system4_MC_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline and Over/Under markets, targeting Hamburger SV -1 and Draw and Under 2.25 and Under 2.5. Average expected value was 37.0%, with a combined stake of $1074. The sharpest edge was on Hamburger SV -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 74.4% probability versus the market's implied 47.4% — a 27.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.11. **Result:** All 17 trades won, netting +$1220.36. ### Wave 3 — Minute 48' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 48'. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 1.5. Average expected value was 16.8%, with a combined stake of $120. The sharpest edge was on Under 1.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 55.5% probability versus the market's implied 40.0% — a 15.5 percentage point gap at odds of 2.5. **Result:** All 2 trades lost, netting $-120.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 53' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 53'. 1 model (system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Moneyline and Over/Under and Asian Handicap markets, targeting Draw and Under 1.5 and Hamburger SV -1. Average expected value was 31.9%, with a combined stake of $417. The sharpest edge was on Hamburger SV -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 81.0% probability versus the market's implied 53.8% — a 27.2 percentage point gap at odds of 1.86. **Result:** 6 of 7 trades won, netting +$465.45. ### Wave 5 — Minute 58' (Score: 0-0) **Context:** Scoreless at 58'. 4 models (system4_BLEND_v10, oddsflow_core_v8.1, system4_MC_v10, system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Moneyline and Asian Handicap and Over/Under markets, targeting Draw and Hamburger SV -0.5 and Hamburger SV and Bayer Leverkusen -0.5 and Hamburger SV 0 and Under 2.5 and Under 2.25. Average expected value was 21.4%, with a combined stake of $1784. The sharpest edge was on Under 2.25 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 74.8% probability versus the market's implied 48.8% — a 26.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.05. **Result:** 13 of 23 trades won, netting +$779.12. ### Wave 6 — Minute 71' (Score: 0-1) **Context:** Hamburger SV leading 0-1 at 71'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting Bayer Leverkusen +0.5. Average expected value was 28.0%, with a combined stake of $120. The sharpest edge was on Bayer Leverkusen +0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 83.6% probability versus the market's implied 58.8% — a 24.8 percentage point gap at odds of 1.7. **Result:** All 2 trades won, netting +$84.00.
Key Mispricing Moments
- **Minute 53'** — Asian Handicap Hamburger SV -1: AI saw 81.0% vs market's 53.8% (27.2pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 40'** — Asian Handicap Hamburger SV -1: AI saw 74.4% vs market's 47.4% (27.0pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 53'** — Asian Handicap Hamburger SV -1: AI saw 81.0% vs market's 54.1% (26.9pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 40'** — Asian Handicap Hamburger SV -1: AI saw 74.1% vs market's 47.4% (26.7pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 40'** — Asian Handicap Hamburger SV -1: AI saw 74.4% vs market's 48.2% (26.2pp gap). correctly identified.
Model Performance
- **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 7 trades, 6W/1L, +$792.00 (ROI: +93.2%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 15 trades, 10W/3L/2V, +$687.45 (ROI: +76.7%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 15 trades, 9W/4L/2V, +$621.66 (ROI: +70.2%) - **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 14 trades, 7W/5L/2V, +$327.82 (ROI: +37.1%) - **S5.1_Pre**: 1 trades, 1W/0L, +$10.30 (ROI: +103.0%)
Match Statistics
Possession was 60–40 in Bayer Leverkusen's favor. Bayer Leverkusen had 22 shots (6 on target) versus Hamburger SV's 18 (5 on target). Expected goals: Bayer Leverkusen 2.75 — Hamburger SV 1.33. Corners: 6-3.
Verdict
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +69.2% ROI. Top performer: oddsflow_core_v8.1 at +$792.00.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 78.1% / 14.7% / 11.1% |
| Asian handicap | -1.75 | 52.6% |
| Over / Under | 3.75 | 53.5% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
The most significant market inefficiency was the mispricing of the Totals market, where the Under 3.75 was a strong Value Signal.
The match between Bayer Leverkusen and Hamburger SV ended in a 1-1 draw. The 1x2 market heavily favored Bayer Leverkusen with a 78.13% win probability, significantly underpricing the actual draw outcome. In the Handicap market, Leverkusen failed to cover the -1.75 line, validating a potential Value Signal against the favored team. Most notably, the Totals market misjudged the goal count; despite a 53.48% market expectation for Over 3.75 goals, the game concluded with only 2 goals, indicating a strong Closing Line Value (CLV) opportunity on the Under. OddsFlow AI identifies this as a clear example of market sentiment overestimating offensive output.
A highly profitable match for OddsFlow. The AI models identified significant mispricings and converted them efficiently, returning +69.2% ROI on 52 trades. Top performer: Oddsflow Core Strategy at +$792.00.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.