1899 Hoffenheim
1899 Hoffenheim hosted FSV Mainz 05 in the Bundesliga, finishing 1-2. Goals: P. Tietz (13'), F. Asllani (23'), P. Tietz (79'). OddsFlow deployed 14 trades across 7 waves, achieving 57% precision with a net result of +$1234.50 (ROI: +17.5%).
The Asian Handicap held at -0.75 but home odds shifted from 2.01 to 1.97; the Over/Under stayed at 3 with Over odds moving from 1.85 to 1.93.
### Wave 1 — Minute 25' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1 after F. Asllani's equalizer at 23'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline markets, targeting FSV Mainz 05 -0.5 and Draw. Average expected value was 8.6%, with a combined stake of $1500. The sharpest edge was on FSV Mainz 05 -0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 55.0% probability versus the market's implied 47.6% — a 7.4 percentage point gap at odds of 2.1. **Result:** 2 of 3 trades won, netting +$600.00. ### Wave 2 — Minute 32' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1 after F. Asllani's equalizer at 23'. 1 model (system4_MC_v10) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline markets, targeting 1899 Hoffenheim -0.5 and 1899 Hoffenheim. Average expected value was 7.7%, with a combined stake of $1000. The sharpest edge was on 1899 Hoffenheim (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 44.4% probability versus the market's implied 38.5% — a 6.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.6. **Result:** All 2 trades lost, netting $-1000.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 38' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1 after F. Asllani's equalizer at 23'. 1 model (system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting 1899 Hoffenheim. Average expected value was 5.2%, with a combined stake of $500. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-500.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 42' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 42'. 1 model (system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting Draw. Average expected value was 5.1%, with a combined stake of $500. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 32.8% probability versus the market's implied 26.7% — a 6.1 percentage point gap at odds of 3.75. **Result:** All 1 trades lost, netting $-500.00. ### Wave 5 — Minute 46' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 46'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting FSV Mainz 05 0. Average expected value was 10.1%, with a combined stake of $1500. The sharpest edge was on FSV Mainz 05 0 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 61.8% probability versus the market's implied 53.3% — a 8.4 percentage point gap at odds of 1.875. **Result:** All 3 trades won, netting +$1300.00. ### Wave 6 — Minute 61' (Score: 1-1) **Context:** Level at 1-1, 61'. 1 model (system4_HYBRID_v10) entered Moneyline and Asian Handicap markets, targeting Draw and FSV Mainz 05 -0.5. Average expected value was 21.9%, with a combined stake of $1556. The sharpest edge was on Draw (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 51.2% probability versus the market's implied 28.6% — a 22.6 percentage point gap at odds of 3.5. **Result:** 2 of 3 trades won, netting +$584.50. ### Wave 7 — Minute 80' (Score: 1-2) **Context:** FSV Mainz 05 leading 1-2 at 80'. P. Tietz scored moments ago. 1 model (system4_BLEND_v10) entered Moneyline markets, targeting FSV Mainz 05. Average expected value was 25.4%, with a combined stake of $500. The sharpest edge was on FSV Mainz 05 (Moneyline): OddsFlow calculated 62.2% probability versus the market's implied 40.0% — a 22.2 percentage point gap at odds of 2.5. **Result:** All 1 trades won, netting +$750.00.
- **Minute 61'** — Moneyline Draw: AI saw 51.2% vs market's 28.6% (22.6pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 80'** — Moneyline FSV Mainz 05: AI saw 62.2% vs market's 40.0% (22.2pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 61'** — Asian Handicap FSV Mainz 05 -0.5: AI saw 69.0% vs market's 48.2% (20.8pp gap). correctly identified. - **Minute 61'** — Asian Handicap FSV Mainz 05 -0.5: AI saw 68.5% vs market's 50.6% (17.8pp gap). correctly identified.
- **system4_BLEND_v10**: 5 trades, 3W/2L, +$725.00 (ROI: +29.0%) - **system4_HYBRID_v10**: 3 trades, 2W/1L, +$584.50 (ROI: +37.6%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 6 trades, 3W/3L, $-75.00 (ROI: -2.5%)
Possession was 60%–40% in 1899 Hoffenheim's favor. 1899 Hoffenheim had 16 shots (5 on target) versus FSV Mainz 05's 9 (5 on target). Expected goals: 1899 Hoffenheim 1.23 — FSV Mainz 05 2.16. Corners: 7-3.
A positive result for OddsFlow with +17.5% ROI. The models found genuine edges though not all converted. Top performer: system4_BLEND_v10 at +$725.00.
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 56.8% / 24.5% / 22.3% |
| Asian handicap | -0.75 | 50.8% |
| Over / Under | 3 | 51.8% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
Underdog Away Win - Major 1x2 Mispricing
The Bundesliga clash saw FSV Mainz 05 secure a 1-2 away victory against 1899 Hoffenheim. The 1x2 market presented a significant **market inefficiency**, with 1899 Hoffenheim closing as the substantial favorite at an implied probability of 56.82%. Mainz 05's victory, carrying an implied probability of just 22.32%, delivered considerable **Closing Line Value** for those backing the underdog. On the Asian Handicap, the line was set at -0.75 for Hoffenheim. Mainz 05 (+0.75) comfortably covered, aligning with the market's slight lean towards the underdog covering (51.81% implied probability). The Totals market, set at 3 goals, saw an exactly 3-goal outcome. While the market slightly favored the Over (51.81% implied probability), the final tally resulted in a push, indicating decent efficiency on the goal line.
A positive result with +17.5% ROI. The models found genuine edges, finishing at +$1234.50. Top performer: Active Trader at +$725.00.
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.