1. FC Heidenheim2 - 0FC St. Pauli
1. FC HeidenheimWhy did AI enter 4 times at 33', 41', 74', 78' — and still finish $-460?
Match Overview
1. FC Heidenheim hosted FC St. Pauli in the Bundesliga, finishing 2-0. Goals: B. Zivzivadze (3'), E. Dinkci (82'). OddsFlow deployed 13 trades across 4 waves, achieving 46% precision with a net result of $-459.57 (ROI: -5.4%).
Pre-Match Odds
The Asian Handicap line moved from 0 to -0.25; the home moneyline shortened from 2.58 to 2.38.
Trade Wave Analysis
### Wave 1 — Minute 33' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** 1. FC Heidenheim leading 1-0 at 33'. 3 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10, oddsflow_core_v8.1) entered Asian Handicap and Moneyline and Over/Under markets, targeting FC St. Pauli -1 and 1. FC Heidenheim and Under 3.5. Average expected value was 20.8%, with a combined stake of $4425. The sharpest edge was on FC St. Pauli -1 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 88.8% probability versus the market's implied 55.6% — a 33.3 percentage point gap at odds of 1.8. **Result:** 4 of 7 trades won, netting +$1039.93. ### Wave 2 — Minute 41' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** 1. FC Heidenheim leading 1-0 at 41'. 2 models (system4_MC_v10, system4_BLEND_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting FC St. Pauli 0. Average expected value was 27.7%, with a combined stake of $1000. The sharpest edge was on FC St. Pauli 0 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 70.5% probability versus the market's implied 45.5% — a 25.1 percentage point gap at odds of 2.2. **Result:** All 2 trades lost, netting $-1000.00. ### Wave 3 — Minute 74' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** 1. FC Heidenheim leading 1-0 at 74'. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Asian Handicap markets, targeting FC St. Pauli -0.5. Average expected value was 45.1%, with a combined stake of $1347. The sharpest edge was on FC St. Pauli -0.5 (Asian Handicap): OddsFlow calculated 80.4% probability versus the market's implied 37.4% — a 43.0 percentage point gap at odds of 2.675. **Result:** All 2 trades lost, netting $-1347.00. ### Wave 4 — Minute 78' (Score: 1-0) **Context:** 1. FC Heidenheim leading 1-0 at 78'. 2 models (system4_BLEND_v10, system4_MC_v10) entered Over/Under markets, targeting Under 2.5. Average expected value was 24.2%, with a combined stake of $1695. The sharpest edge was on Under 2.5 (Over/Under): OddsFlow calculated 87.9% probability versus the market's implied 66.7% — a 21.3 percentage point gap at odds of 1.5. **Result:** All 2 trades won, netting +$847.50.
Key Mispricing Moments
- **Minute 74'** — Asian Handicap FC St. Pauli -0.5: AI saw 80.4% vs market's 37.4% (43.0pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 74'** — Asian Handicap FC St. Pauli -0.5: AI saw 80.2% vs market's 37.4% (42.8pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 33'** — Asian Handicap FC St. Pauli -1: AI saw 88.8% vs market's 55.6% (33.3pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 33'** — Asian Handicap FC St. Pauli -1: AI saw 88.8% vs market's 55.6% (33.2pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real. - **Minute 33'** — Asian Handicap FC St. Pauli -1: AI saw 88.5% vs market's 55.6% (32.9pp gap). did not convert, but edge was real.
Model Performance
- **oddsflow_core_v8.1**: 1 trades, 0W/0L/1V, +$0.00 (ROI: +0.0%) - **system4_MC_v10**: 6 trades, 3W/2L/1V, $-229.57 (ROI: -5.5%) - **system4_BLEND_v10**: 6 trades, 3W/2L/1V, $-230.00 (ROI: -5.6%)
Match Statistics
1. FC Heidenheim had 11 shots (4 on target) versus FC St. Pauli's 3 (1 on target). Expected goals: 1. FC Heidenheim 1.31 — FC St. Pauli 0.44. Corners: 6-2.
Verdict
A marginally negative session at -5.4% ROI. The edge identification was sound but variance went against the positions. Top performer: oddsflow_core_v8.1 at +$0.00.
What the closing market expected
The prices bookmakers settled on before kick-off, with the margin removed, next to what actually happened.
| Market | Line | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
| 1X2 (home / draw / away) | Favourite: Home | 42.0% / 28.9% / 31.9% |
| Asian handicap | -0.25 | 48.5% |
| Over / Under | 2.5 | 51.5% |
Probabilities are de-vigged, so they describe the market's view rather than the price you would have been offered.
The market significantly mispriced the Under 2.5 goals outcome.
The match between 1. FC Heidenheim and FC St. Pauli concluded with a 2-0 victory for the home side. In the 1x2 market, OddsFlow AI's model identified Heidenheim as the slight favorite with a 42.02% win probability, which aligned with the actual outcome. For the Asian Handicap, Heidenheim successfully covered the -0.25 line, despite the market narrowly favoring St. Pauli +0.25 (53.48% vs 48.54% for Heidenheim to cover). The most notable market inefficiency was observed in the Totals (Over/Under) market. The closing line for total goals was 2.5, with the market showing a slight lean towards the Over (51.55% vs 51.02% for Under). However, the match finished with only two goals, resulting in an Under 2.5 outcome. This indicates a clear mispricing by the market, where betting the Under would have represented significant EV+ (Expected Value Positive).
A marginally negative session at -5.4% ROI. The edge identification was sound but variance went against the positions. Top performer: Oddsflow Core Strategy at +$0.00.
See AI signals as they happen
This report shows settled results. Get real-time AI signals during live matches.